[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: flashchips: Add GD25Q128E name to the GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C entry

[Hsuan-ting Chen (Code Review)]

Attention is currently required from: Hsuan-ting Chen, Nikolai Artemiev, Stefan Reinauer.

Hello Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Stefan Reinauer, build bot (Jenkins),

I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit

https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/78348?usp=email

to look at the new patch set (#2).

The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Verified+1 by build bot (Jenkins)

Change subject: flashchips: Add GD25Q128E name to the GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C entry
......................................................................

flashchips: Add GD25Q128E name to the GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C entry

Datasheet for Q128E: https://www.gigadevice.com.cn/Public/Uploads/uploadfile/files/20220714/DS-00...

Q128E and Q127C/Q128C have compatible main functions, their differences
are:

* Q128E uses 55 nm process, while Q127C/Q128C use 65nm
* Q128E does not support QPI
* Q128E have OTP: 3072B, while Q127C/Q128C are 1536B
* Q128E's fast read clock frequency is 133MHz, while Q127C/Q128C are
  104MHZ

We also tested that Q128E could pass flashrom_tester while probing it as
127C/128C, so the main functionalities are compatible.

Change the chip name from GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C to
GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C/GD25Q128E to make it more accurate.

Chip revision history:
- The 'GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C' definition was added in
  `commit e0c7abf219b81ad049d09a4671ebc9196153d308` as 'GD25Q128C' and
  later renamed to 'GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C'

BUG=b:304863141, b:293545382
BRANCH=none
TEST=flashrom_tester with flashrom binary could pass with Q128E,
     which contains probe, read, write, erase, and write protect

Signed-off-by: Hsuan Ting Chen 
Change-Id: I3300671b1cf74b3ea0469b9c5a833489ab4914f5
---
M flashchips.c
M include/flashchips.h
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/48/78348/2