Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: Fix up stale FIXME comment when doit() was removed

[Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review)]

Edward O'Callaghan has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52365 )

Change subject: flashrom.c: Fix up stale FIXME comment when doit() was removed
......................................................................

flashrom.c: Fix up stale FIXME comment when doit() was removed

Once upon a time flashrom had a entry point function called
doit(). Excise the last mention of it here so that we may
never mention it again.

BUG=none
TEST=none

Change-Id: I40d815b7154456c323b4230cd3fed2cc2e8e3641
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan 
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52365
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) 
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk 
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel 
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons 
---
M flashrom.c
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  build bot (Jenkins): Verified
  Paul Menzel: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
  Angel Pons: Looks good to me, approved
  Anastasia Klimchuk: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve

diff --git a/flashrom.c b/flashrom.c
index c89abad..056fc57 100644
--- a/flashrom.c
+++ b/flashrom.c
@@ -2189,8 +2189,8 @@
    return ret;
 }

-/* FIXME: This function signature needs to be improved once doit() has a better
- * function signature.
+/* FIXME: This function signature needs to be improved once prepare_flash_access()
+ * has a better function signature.
  */
 static int chip_safety_check(const struct flashctx *flash, int force,
    		     int read_it, int write_it, int erase_it, int verify_it)