Change in flashrom[master]: SFDP: drop static table length check to make newer SFDP revisions work

[Angel Pons (Code Review)]

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan,  Felix Singer, Nico Huber, Michael Niewöhner, Anastasia Klimchuk.
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60055 )

Change subject: SFDP: drop static table length check to make newer SFDP revisions work
......................................................................

Patch Set 2:

(1 comment)

Commit Message:

https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60055/comment/0bd20464_c1494307 
PS1, Line 28: ***RFC*** We could maintain a list of revisions/lengths but is it really
            : worth it?
            :
> RFC

IMHO, if the SFDP specs *mandate* a specific length, we could check for it. However, if that is not the case, I think it won't be worth it in the long run.

We still need to check the revision number to properly parse the data (i.e. only parse newer fields if the revision is high enough).