Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62777 )
Change subject: tests/: Factor out all link-time wrapped func
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS3:
That's a good idea, and I was thinking about something similar too, so thank you! :)
When I was thinking about it, I was going to have port io wraps it their own file.
Second thing is that this patch needs to, if possible, wait for CB:63489 to get merged.
I suggest, don't do anything right now (just to save time), let's get meson compiler options done and then come back to this one? is that okay?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62777
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic5e18c9390c064a3112caa7f5778569ae478552d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 62777
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Campello <campello(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:15:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Subrata Banik, Nico Huber, Angel Pons.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62891 )
Change subject: ichspi: Introduce HSFC_FCYCLE_MASK(n) macro
......................................................................
Patch Set 11:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS6:
> Also without this CL, the Flash Cycle bit field width is wrong for latest chipset. It's 4 bit width on PCH as per EDS but without this CL, we are still considering it 2 bit.
Sorry I just noticed this. It is still true, that this patch fixes a bug? The comment is about Patchset6, and code has changed since then, so I am not sure is this still true? The latest patchset does not make changes to the code itself, only to macro definitions.
If the patch does fix a bug, the info needs to be added to commit message. (if not then not).
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62891
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id222304165610c7ae48e365d72ec8fdeea51c51d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 62891
Gerrit-PatchSet: 11
Gerrit-Owner: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-CC: Subrata Banik <subi.banik(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subi.banik(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:42:25 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Namyoon Woo, Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63831 )
Change subject: dummyflasher: move struct declaration & probe_variable_size to spi.(h|c)
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
Might be best to figure out first what the code tries to express. If this
is only about emulating something with a command-line configurable size,
it should implement an `opaque` master instead. That would leave no doubt
where to place the code and magically use the proper pointers (no link-
time trouble).
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63831
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic93c8b9ba7b9f7ce5fe49326c8de34070ca83a2e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 63831
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Namyoon Woo <namyoon(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Namyoon Woo <namyoon(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:34:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons.
Peter Farley has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63798 )
Change subject: ft2232_spi: Reduce read size for FT232H
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63798/comment/826d7b87_7e23e539
PS1, Line 9: FT232H-based devices are unable to read over 256 bytes of flash in one
> One more general thought: Is there any other software running that might
> try to access the FT232H device? any kernel driver or anything using libusb
> should not cause any trouble, but who knows...
The only thing I notice is that when the device is attached, it gets associated with the `ftdi_sio` driver. But after `flashrom` takes control, it appears to release it. Unloading and blacklisting that module doesn't make a difference either.
> What would be interesting is if it
> always stops at that point or if always on a 4096B boundary. I guess it
> would suffice to re-run the capture and check if/how the number of frames
> changes. The 4096B these URBs request are probably the default read chunk
> size of libftdi. So lowering this (maybe to an odd multiple of 512, e.g.
> 1536) to see if it still fails after a full chunk might be interesting as
> well. If it does it would further increase my suspicion that it's a soft-
> ware issue.
Testing it some more, even without changing the chunk size, the number of received packets is not constant. It seems I might have been lucky getting a full 64K yesterday, today I am seeing anywhere between 0 and 5 4080B blocks.
Due to its apparent randomness, I can't say definitively, but decreasing the chunk size from 4096 to 1536 does increase the average RX packet count (over only 5 iterations), from 2 to 8.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63798
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2a45fb8ac8ff37bbf01b0cb6b88851cf74af495d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 63798
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Peter Farley <far.peter1(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:03:46 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Peter Farley <far.peter1(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Felix Singer, Martin L Roth, Thomas Heijligen, Angel Pons.
Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63671 )
Change subject: Close GitHub PRs and issues automatically
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS3:
> My reply became much bigger as I intended it to be, but I think it's a good analysis at least :) […]
I agree with Felix's analysis.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63671
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8076f0fb964970ffd05f355b9d1e33a65aa7a3c8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 63671
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin L Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin L Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:40:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Martin L Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Anastasia Klimchuk, Peter Marheine.
Thomas Heijligen has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63724 )
Change subject: [WIP] meson: rework the programmer selection
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS2:
> Will not build if not one or more usb programmer are selected. […]
CB:63832
PS2:
> Will not build when the `dummy` programmer is not selected. […]
CB:63831
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63724
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib44b26e3748fc71f116184082b4aed0bb208b4c1
Gerrit-Change-Number: 63724
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-CC: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Richard Hughes <richard(a)hughsie.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:42:07 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment