- flashrom-gerrit - mail.coreboot.org

Change in flashrom[master]: CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_NAME: Use programmer name instead of enum
by Thomas Heijligen (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Thomas Heijligen has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123 ) Change subject: CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_NAME: Use programmer name instead of enum ...................................................................... Patch Set 10: (1 comment) File meson.build: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123/comment/00edbc54_bf5af7b6 PS10, Line 448: cargs += '-DCONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_ARGS="' + config_default_programmer_args + '"' > Doesn't this work for an empty string as well? I'll try -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I976447787c6f6bfbdc0145d80d61e1ddcf97ac33 Gerrit-Change-Number: 55123 Gerrit-PatchSet: 10 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:02:41 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: dummyflasher.c: Fix data leak in params processing error paths
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Nico Huber has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748 ) Change subject: dummyflasher.c: Fix data leak in params processing error paths ...................................................................... dummyflasher.c: Fix data leak in params processing error paths This patch extracts params processing into a separate function. Now all error paths of params processing return 1 back to init function which frees data. And there was just one more error path in init function where free(data) needed to be added. This is a follow up on commit 3b8fe0f8e907c0ba9f7c7935e950f3e1538d427f which moves global state into spi_master data. A good side-effect of the change is: init function becomes easier to read. BUG=b:185191942 TEST=ninja test Change-Id: I04f55f77bb4703f1d88b2191c45a22be3c97bf87 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> --- M dummyflasher.c 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Nico Huber: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/dummyflasher.c b/dummyflasher.c index dcf97b5..e2f38f5 100644 --- a/dummyflasher.c +++ b/dummyflasher.c @@ -643,30 +643,17 @@ return 0; } -int dummy_init(void) +static int init_data(struct emu_data *data, enum chipbustype *dummy_buses_supported) { + char *bustext = NULL; char *tmp = NULL; unsigned int i; + char *endptr; #if EMULATE_SPI_CHIP char *status = NULL; int size = -1; /* size for VARIABLE_SIZE chip device */ #endif -#if EMULATE_CHIP - struct stat image_stat; -#endif - char *endptr; - - struct emu_data *data = calloc(1, sizeof(struct emu_data)); - if (!data) { - msg_perr("Out of memory!\n"); - return 1; - } - data->emu_chip = EMULATE_NONE; - data->delay_us = 0; - data->spi_write_256_chunksize = 256; - - msg_pspew("%s\n", __func__); bustext = extract_programmer_param("bus"); msg_pdbg("Requested buses are: %s\n", bustext ? bustext : "default"); @@ -675,24 +662,24 @@ /* Convert the parameters to lowercase. */ tolower_string(bustext); - enum chipbustype dummy_buses_supported = BUS_NONE; + *dummy_buses_supported = BUS_NONE; if (strstr(bustext, "parallel")) { - dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_PARALLEL; + *dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_PARALLEL; msg_pdbg("Enabling support for %s flash.\n", "parallel"); } if (strstr(bustext, "lpc")) { - dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_LPC; + *dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_LPC; msg_pdbg("Enabling support for %s flash.\n", "LPC"); } if (strstr(bustext, "fwh")) { - dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_FWH; + *dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_FWH; msg_pdbg("Enabling support for %s flash.\n", "FWH"); } if (strstr(bustext, "spi")) { - dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_SPI; + *dummy_buses_supported |= BUS_SPI; msg_pdbg("Enabling support for %s flash.\n", "SPI"); } - if (dummy_buses_supported == BUS_NONE) + if (*dummy_buses_supported == BUS_NONE) msg_pdbg("Support for all flash bus types disabled.\n"); free(bustext); @@ -838,14 +825,15 @@ } free(tmp); } -#endif +#endif /* EMULATE_SPI_CHIP */ tmp = extract_programmer_param("emulate"); if (!tmp) { msg_pdbg("Not emulating any flash chip.\n"); /* Nothing else to do. */ - goto dummy_init_out; + return 0; } + #if EMULATE_SPI_CHIP if (!strcmp(tmp, "M25P10.RES")) { data->emu_chip = EMULATE_ST_M25P10_RES; @@ -933,7 +921,7 @@ msg_pdbg("Emulating generic SPI flash chip (size=%d bytes)\n", data->emu_chip_size); } -#endif +#endif /* EMULATE_SPI_CHIP */ if (data->emu_chip == EMULATE_NONE) { msg_perr("Invalid chip specified for emulation: %s\n", tmp); free(tmp); @@ -972,7 +960,7 @@ msg_pdbg("Initial status register is set to 0x%02x.\n", data->emu_status); } -#endif +#endif /* EMULATE_SPI_CHIP */ data->flashchip_contents = malloc(data->emu_chip_size); if (!data->flashchip_contents) { @@ -980,6 +968,41 @@ return 1; } +#endif /* EMULATE_CHIP */ + + return 0; +} + +int dummy_init(void) +{ +#if EMULATE_CHIP + struct stat image_stat; +#endif + + struct emu_data *data = calloc(1, sizeof(struct emu_data)); + if (!data) { + msg_perr("Out of memory!\n"); + return 1; + } + data->emu_chip = EMULATE_NONE; + data->delay_us = 0; + data->spi_write_256_chunksize = 256; + + msg_pspew("%s\n", __func__); + + enum chipbustype dummy_buses_supported; + if (init_data(data, &dummy_buses_supported)) { + free(data); + return 1; + } + +#if EMULATE_CHIP + if (data->emu_chip == EMULATE_NONE) { + msg_pdbg("Not emulating any flash chip.\n"); + /* Nothing else to do. */ + goto dummy_init_out; + } + msg_pdbg("Filling fake flash chip with 0x%02x, size %i\n", data->erase_to_zero ? 0x00 : 0xff, data->emu_chip_size); memset(data->flashchip_contents, data->erase_to_zero ? 0x00 : 0xff, data->emu_chip_size); @@ -1003,13 +1026,14 @@ msg_perr("Unable to read %s\n", data->emu_persistent_image); free(data->emu_persistent_image); free(data->flashchip_contents); + free(data); return 1; } } else { msg_pdbg("doesn't match.\n"); } } -#endif +#endif /* EMULATE_CHIP */ dummy_init_out: if (register_shutdown(dummy_shutdown, data)) { -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I04f55f77bb4703f1d88b2191c45a22be3c97bf87 Gerrit-Change-Number: 54748 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Namyoon Woo <namyoon(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-MessageType: merged

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: dummyflasher.c: Fix data leak in params processing error paths
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748 ) Change subject: dummyflasher.c: Fix data leak in params processing error paths ...................................................................... Patch Set 6: (2 comments) File dummyflasher.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748/comment/76d2c2fc_b49c61fb PS1, Line 26: /* Remove the #define below if you don't want SPI flash chip emulation. */ : #define EMULATE_SPI_CHIP 1 > > What I was wondering, is if EMULATE_SPI_CHIP is undefined then some chunks of code won't be includ […] I think the behavior can be achieved with respective command-line options. If it was a global option to exclude all SPI code from the build, I would understand it. But this local, unused flag just makes maintenance harder, IMHO. File dummyflasher.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748/comment/f1977694_dc32c6cc PS5, Line 653: #if EMULATE_SPI_CHIP > thank you! I will rebased once CB:55265 and CB:55266 are submitted. This change was ready to be submitted first, so I guess it's fair to let Angel rebase (also their patch is easier to re-review). -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54748 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I04f55f77bb4703f1d88b2191c45a22be3c97bf87 Gerrit-Change-Number: 54748 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Namyoon Woo <namyoon(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:55:51 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: programmer_table: move each entry to the associated programmer source
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Anastasia Klimchuk. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52946 ) Change subject: programmer_table: move each entry to the associated programmer source ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: (1 comment) File programmer.h: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52946/comment/b6d6eae9_9e7a339e PS4, Line 402: #if CONFIG_DUMMY == 1 > I am trying to understand, why it has to be an error (compile-time or link-time)? If some CONFIG_xxx […] What I meant is that for sound code, it makes no difference. Only if there is an error like trying to use `programmer_internal` with `CONFIG_INTERNAL=no`. With the #if, it would be a compiler error (undeclared). Without the #if, it would be a linker error (undefined). -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52946 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I3d02bd789f0299e936eb86819b3b15b5ea2bb921 Gerrit-Change-Number: 52946 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:46:51 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_NAME: Use programmer name instead of enum
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123 ) Change subject: CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_NAME: Use programmer name instead of enum ...................................................................... Patch Set 10: Code-Review+2 (2 comments) File cli_classic.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123/comment/1d17f939_01949db0 PS5, Line 554: #ifndef CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_ARGS : #define CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_ARGS "" : #endif > This too should be covered outside C. […] Done File meson.build: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123/comment/62ea62cc_f1707352 PS10, Line 448: cargs += '-DCONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER_ARGS="' + config_default_programmer_args + '"' Doesn't this work for an empty string as well? -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55123 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I976447787c6f6bfbdc0145d80d61e1ddcf97ac33 Gerrit-Change-Number: 55123 Gerrit-PatchSet: 10 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:41:47 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: programmer_init: use struct programmer_entry*
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55121 ) Change subject: programmer_init: use struct programmer_entry* ...................................................................... Patch Set 9: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55121 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iacf0f25abc94a84c5d52c8d69a3e8640817b060a Gerrit-Change-Number: 55121 Gerrit-PatchSet: 9 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:33:08 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c libflashrom.c: replace enum programmer with size_t
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55120 ) Change subject: flashrom.c libflashrom.c: replace enum programmer with size_t ...................................................................... Patch Set 8: Code-Review+2 (1 comment) Patchset: PS4: > We can do this outside of this series Well, `unsigned int i` is much more common in flashrom. Anyway, no need to bikeshed. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55120 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id2ad9630fbc41e98d182768b553788e069fa5095 Gerrit-Change-Number: 55120 Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:32:23 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: flashrom.c: replace enum programmer with struct programmer_entry*
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Angel Pons. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55119 ) Change subject: flashrom.c: replace enum programmer with struct programmer_entry* ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55119 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I478c56354d5f482010bfe1560489700bc889717a Gerrit-Change-Number: 55119 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:28:50 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: print.c: use static string for internal programmer name
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55118 ) Change subject: print.c: use static string for internal programmer name ...................................................................... Patch Set 7: Code-Review+2 (1 comment) File print.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55118/comment/9136be3a_5aab8513 PS3, Line 478: programmer_table[PROGRAMMER_INTERNAL]->name > The code is explicit for the internal programmer. And similar code uses also a static string. […] Hmmm, right. I thought "If the original author took care to avoid reduncancy, ...", but this is really just a single case out of so many. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55118 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If2cf95c71425efdd864457e213dd34b929fe8805 Gerrit-Change-Number: 55118 Gerrit-PatchSet: 7 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:28:00 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

Change in flashrom[master]: programmer_table: replace PROGRAMMER_INVALID with programmer_table_size
by Nico Huber (Code Review) 09 Jun '21

09 Jun '21

Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan. Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55117 ) Change subject: programmer_table: replace PROGRAMMER_INVALID with programmer_table_size ...................................................................... Patch Set 6: (1 comment) Commit Message: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55117/comment/49baf3f0_0c3f5990 PS3, Line 7: programmer_table: replace PROGRAMMER_INVALID to programmer_table_size in itterations > I want to introduce first all necessary items before using them Ack from my side. The commit-split felt quite digestible. Smaller commits keep me focused. -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55117 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Icaaeefe001de604df9d7fdd06f05a5ed39fdbd84 Gerrit-Change-Number: 55117 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org> Gerrit-CC: Xiang W <wxjstz(a)126.com> Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:24:14 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Thomas Heijligen <src(a)posteo.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

flashrom-gerrit