On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:54:53 +0200
Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> Nuff said.
> Well, the S33 naming might be no ideal, RFC.
>
> Stefan Tauner (4):
> Improve SPI status register pretty printing.
> Add a generic SPI block unprotect function.
> Add support for Intel S33 series flash chips.
> Add support for Atmel's AT25F series of SPI flash chips.
>
> Makefile | 4 +-
> a25.c | 100 ---------
> at25.c | 281 -------------------------
> chipdrivers.h | 50 +++--
> flash.h | 1 +
> flashchips.c | 522 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> flashchips.h | 17 +-
> spi.h | 8 +-
> spi25.c | 298 ++------------------------
> spi25_statusreg.c | 601 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 1169 insertions(+), 713 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 a25.c
> delete mode 100644 at25.c
> create mode 100644 spi25_statusreg.c
Self-acked and committed in r1634-r1637 with small improvements in 1/4.
--
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen GrĆ¼Ćen, Stefan Tauner