As the comment indicates, that function is not a chip erase function
at all, but a function calling a block eraser in a loop. So it adds
no extra value to what we already have in the block_eraser
infrastructure.
Furthermore, that function assumes a uniform sector size layout, but
is referenced from flash chip with non-uniform sector size layout, which
is just wrong.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom(a)mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
---
flashchips.c | 27 ---------------------------
stm50flw0x0x.c | 27 ---------------------------
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c
index 753a094..b36f6ee 100644
--- a/flashchips.c
+++ b/flashchips.c
@@ -6852,9 +6852,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
}, {
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 8}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -6887,9 +6884,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
}, {
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 8}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -6922,9 +6916,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
}, {
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 16}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -6957,9 +6948,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
}, {
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 16}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -6989,9 +6977,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
{16 * 1024, 1},
},
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {256 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -7016,9 +7001,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
{
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 32}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {2 * 1024 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -7043,9 +7025,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
{
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 8}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -7070,9 +7049,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
{
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 16}, },
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
@@ -7103,9 +7079,6 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
{16 * 1024, 1},
},
.block_erase = erase_block_82802ab,
- }, {
- .eraseblocks = { {2 * 1024 * 1024, 1} },
- .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
}
},
.unlock = unlock_stm50flw0x0x,
diff --git a/stm50flw0x0x.c b/stm50flw0x0x.c
index 60e5c45..726a882 100644
--- a/stm50flw0x0x.c
+++ b/stm50flw0x0x.c
@@ -114,30 +114,3 @@ int erase_sector_stm50flw0x0x(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int sector, unsi
return 0;
}
-
-/* FIXME: This function is not a real chip erase function. */
-int erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen)
-{
- int i;
- int total_size = flash->total_size * 1024;
- int page_size = flash->page_size;
-
- if ((addr != 0) || (blocklen != flash->total_size * 1024)) {
- msg_cerr("%s called with incorrect arguments\n",
- __func__);
- return -1;
- }
-
- for (i = 0; i < total_size / page_size; i++) {
- //if (unlock_block_stm50flw0x0x(flash, i * page_size)) {
- // msg_cerr("UNLOCK FAILED!\n");
- // return -1;
- //}
- if (erase_block_82802ab(flash, i * page_size, page_size)) {
- msg_cerr("ERASE FAILED!\n");
- return -1;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
--
1.7.2.3