On 27 July 2010 15:28, Alec Wright alecjw@member.fsf.org wrote:
Apparently ERASE is untested on my chip, so I've attached the output of -VE and -Vw Or if mailman loses the attachments: http://alecjw.no-ip.org/eraselog.bz2 http://alecjw.no-ip.org/writelog.bz2 (can't guarantee those files will stay online forever though, so if you need them, grab them while you can!)
Ah I see how you do this now, you make a patch.... Well here it is, I'm new to all this so please let me know if i've done something hideously wrong!
diff -Nau flashrom-old/flashchips.c flashrom/flashchips.c --- flashrom-old/flashchips.c 2010-07-29 01:05:53.441075858 +0100 +++ flashrom/flashchips.c 2010-07-29 01:04:15.197824725 +0100 @@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ .model_id = MX_25L8005, .total_size = 1024, .page_size = 256, - .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, + .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, .probe = probe_spi_rdid, .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = Common subdirectories: flashrom-old/.svn and flashrom/.svn Common subdirectories: flashrom-old/util and flashrom/util
Signed-off by: Alec Wright alecjw@member.fsf.org
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 01:14:47AM +0100, Alec Wright wrote:
Ah I see how you do this now, you make a patch.... Well here it is, I'm new to all this so please let me know if i've done something hideously wrong!
Nope, it's fine. A simpler way to create a patch is "svn diff > foo.patch" btw. but manual diff works too, of course.
We marked the chip respectively now, thanks.
Uwe.