Re: [flashrom] Dediprogress (was: Re: dediprog: Use command 0x0B only on older SF100s)

[Stefan Tauner]

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:42:58 -0700
David Hendricks  wrote:
> (I figured we could use a new thread to track overall progress)
>
> A few more tweaks and now writes work, too:
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/293889

FWIW, I have merged my refined version of Dediprog SF100 supporting the
new protocol. It also enables compilation of the Dediprog programmer by
default (finally).

Dediprogress (was: Re: dediprog: Use command 0x0B only on older SF100s)

[David Hendricks]

It's been a while since we've updated this thread, but that doesn't mean
all has been quiet!

Both upstream and chromium flashroms have new protocol and SF600 support
merged. They are both reasonably fast with the SF600, though the slower
SF100 benefits significantly from some extra optimizations we've added in
the Chromium branch (unbounded reads, ID caching, programmer paranoia).

Next up: 4-byte address support.

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Tauner <
[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:42:58 -0700
> David Hendricks  wrote:
> > (I figured we could use a new thread to track overall progress)
> >
> > A few more tweaks and now writes work, too:
> > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/293889
>
> FWIW, I have merged my refined version of Dediprog SF100 supporting the
> new protocol. It also enables compilation of the Dediprog programmer by
> default (finally).
>
> flashrom mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom