Fix TIMING_IGNORED with correct timing info.
Regards,
David
Signed-off-by: David Borg borg.db@gmail.com
Index: flashchips.c =================================================================== --- flashchips.c (revision 1145) +++ flashchips.c (working copy) @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -256,10 +256,11 @@ .model_id = AM_29LV080B, .total_size = 1024, .page_size = 64 * 1024, + /* datasheet specifies address as don't care */ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -890,7 +891,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -921,7 +922,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -952,7 +953,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -3737,7 +3738,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -3769,7 +3770,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -3801,7 +3802,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -3832,7 +3833,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_OK_PRW, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -3863,7 +3864,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine don't use probe_timing (mx29f002.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers = { { @@ -6125,7 +6126,7 @@ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec, - .probe_timing = TIMING_IGNORED, /* routine doesn't use probe_timing (am29f040b.c) */ + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, /* datasheet specifies no timing */ .block_erasers = { {
Patches seem to be getting mangled up in gmail.. patch attached.
Updated against r1163.
Signed-off-by: David Borg borg.db@gmail.com
Regards,
David
On 1 September 2010 17:10, David Borg borg.db@gmail.com wrote:
Patches seem to be getting mangled up in gmail.. patch attached.
On 14.09.2010 01:37, David Borg wrote:
Updated against r1163.
Signed-off-by: David Borg borg.db@gmail.com
Thanks for your patch. Sorry it took me so long to apply it.
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net and committed in r1242.
Regards, Carl-Daniel