Eraseblock definitions for some chips

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Hi,

I have the following list of erase block structures still lying around:

AMIC_A29002B,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 3} }
 AMIC_A29002T,  { {64 * 1024, 3}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
 EN_29F002B,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 3} }
 EN_29F002T,  { {64 * 1024, 3}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
 MBM29F004BC,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 7} }
 MBM29F004TC,  { {64 * 1024, 7}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
 MBM29F400BC,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 7} }
 MBM29F400TC,  { {64 * 1024, 7}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
 MX_25L3205,  { {4 * 1024, 1024} }
 MX_25L6405,  { {4 * 1024, 2048} }
 MX_29F002B,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 3} }
 MX_29F002T,  { {64 * 1024, 3}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }

No guarantees about completeness (and note that the corresponding erase
functions are not part of that list), but it might be useful in case
someone wants to cross-check his/her work.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

[Sean Nelson]

On 12/22/09 3:49 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following list of erase block structures still lying around:
>
> AMIC_A29002B,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 3} }
>   AMIC_A29002T,  { {64 * 1024, 3}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
>   EN_29F002B,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 3} }
>   EN_29F002T,  { {64 * 1024, 3}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
>   MBM29F004BC,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 7} }
>   MBM29F004TC,  { {64 * 1024, 7}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
>   MBM29F400BC,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 7} }
>   MBM29F400TC,  { {64 * 1024, 7}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
>   MX_25L3205,  { {4 * 1024, 1024} }
>   MX_25L6405,  { {4 * 1024, 2048} }
>   MX_29F002B,  { {16 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {64 * 1024, 3} }
>   MX_29F002T,  { {64 * 1024, 3}, {32 * 1024, 1}, {8 * 1024, 2}, {16 * 1024, 1} }
>
> No guarantees about completeness (and note that the corresponding erase
> functions are not part of that list), but it might be useful in case
> someone wants to cross-check his/her work.
>
> Regards,
> Carl-Daniel

Patch attached.

[Sean Nelson]

Fixups: see patch.

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 23.12.2009 17:38, Sean Nelson wrote:
> Convert the following chips to use struct eraseblock:
> AMIC_A29002B
> AMIC_A29002T
> EN_29F002B
> EN_29F002T
> MBM29F004BC
> MBM29F004TC
> MBM29F400BC
> MBM29F400TC
> MX_25L3205
> MX_25L6405
> MX_29F002B
> MX_29F002T
>
> Add block erasers for m29f400bt and mx29f002.
> Change programmer delays from 2 seconds to 10us in mx29f002 and am29f040b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nelson

Nice.
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

[Sean Nelson]

On 12/23/09 8:51 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 23.12.2009 17:38, Sean Nelson wrote:
> > Convert the following chips to use struct eraseblock:
> > AMIC_A29002B
> > AMIC_A29002T
> > EN_29F002B
> > EN_29F002T
> > MBM29F004BC
> > MBM29F004TC
> > MBM29F400BC
> > MBM29F400TC
> > MX_25L3205
> > MX_25L6405
> > MX_29F002B
> > MX_29F002T
> >
> > Add block erasers for m29f400bt and mx29f002.
> > Change programmer delays from 2 seconds to 10us in mx29f002 and am29f040b.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Nelson
>
> Nice.
> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
>
> Regards,
> Carl-Daniel

Thanks, committed in r819.