we had a mismatch on IRC (nickname clr) where the board enable was executed on an EP-9NPA7I (9 not 8!). he had some other issues too which have to be dealt with, but to be on the safe side i created this patch so that we don't forget about it. i rechecked the lspci and found no better ids, so we have to rely on DMI.
pattern used: "8NPA7I" related DMI strings: DMI string baseboard-product-name: "nForce4 DDR: 8NPA7I, 8NPA7I/G, 8NPAI, 8NPAI/G Series" DMI string baseboard-product-name: "nForce4 DDR: 9NPA7I / 9NPAI Series"
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:38:16AM +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
we had a mismatch on IRC (nickname clr) where the board enable was executed on an EP-9NPA7I (9 not 8!). he had some other issues too which have to be dealt with, but to be on the safe side i created this patch so that we don't forget about it. i rechecked the lspci and found no better ids, so we have to rely on DMI.
pattern used: "8NPA7I" related DMI strings: DMI string baseboard-product-name: "nForce4 DDR: 8NPA7I, 8NPA7I/G, 8NPAI, 8NPAI/G Series" DMI string baseboard-product-name: "nForce4 DDR: 9NPA7I / 9NPAI Series"
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Uwe.
-
Stefan Tauner -
Uwe Hermann