Re: [flashrom] dediprog: Use command 0x0B only on older SF100s

[David Woodhouse]

On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 15:09 -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
> Tested with SF100 V:5.1.5 and SF600 V:7.1.4 (with subsequent patches)
> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks

Can you push a git tree somewhere with those 'subsequent patches'
please? I know you said they're just the ones I posted, but I could
have sworn I'd *tried* what you're doing in this patch, and my testers
said it didn't work (I only have SF100 locally).

http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/flashrom.git has my version of
those 'subsequent patches' — can you confirm that your patch works on
top of that?

dediprog: Use command 0x0B only on older SF100s

[David Hendricks]

Voilà!

https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/293924/

Freed of the shackles of Subversion and Patchwork, maybe now I can get some
real work done on this thing.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:09 AM, David Woodhouse 
wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 15:09 -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
> > Tested with SF100 V:5.1.5 and SF600 V:7.1.4 (with subsequent patches)
> > Signed-off-by: David Hendricks
>
> Can you push a git tree somewhere with those 'subsequent patches'
> please? I know you said they're just the ones I posted, but I could
> have sworn I'd *tried* what you're doing in this patch, and my testers
> said it didn't work (I only have SF100 locally).
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/flashrom.git has my version of
> those 'subsequent patches' — can you confirm that your patch works on
> top of that?
>
> flashrom mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom