Re: [flashrom] report for Intel QM67 | Winbond W25Q64 - layout patches

[Stefan Tauner]

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:00:24 +0200
"Frei, Thomas (GE Germany)"  wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> today I loaded the sources again and I got the R1427.
>
> The patches do not work on this.
>
> So: What revision will I have to check out? Which revision are the patches for?

i have answered this multiple times already e.g. in
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-August/007751.html
you have even quoted it below your message:
> i am not using svn but i think the right command to fetch the correct version of source for those patches is:
> svn update -r 1421

report for Intel QM67 | Winbond W25Q64 - layout patches

[Frei, Thomas (GE Germany)]

I thought, this was a typo, because using this revision leads to an error when patching...

I did the following in detail:

-- snip --
svn co svn://flashrom.org/flashrom/trunk flashrom -r 1421
cd flashrom
patch < 0001-layout-change-return-type-and-name-of-find_next_incl.patch
patch < 0002-Add-deferred-i-processing.patch
-- snip --

The last patch leads to the following errors:

-- snip --
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch)
patching file cli_classic.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 226.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 318.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to cli_classic.c.rej 
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch) 
patching file flash.h 
Hunk #1 FAILED at 255.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to flash.h.rej 
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch) 
patching file layout.c
-- snip --

Isn't this the correct syntax?
Or what else can be wrong???

Regards

Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Tauner [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Montag, 5. September 2011 13:04
To: Frei, Thomas (GE Germany)
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [flashrom] report for Intel QM67 | Winbond W25Q64 - layout patches

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:00:24 +0200
"Frei, Thomas (GE Germany)"  wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> today I loaded the sources again and I got the R1427.
>
> The patches do not work on this.
>
> So: What revision will I have to check out? Which revision are the patches for?

i have answered this multiple times already e.g. in http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-August/007751.html
you have even quoted it below your message:
> i am not using svn but i think the right command to fetch the correct version of source for those patches is:
> svn update -r 1421