Hello Guenter,
Thank you for taking the time to look for info about my MB. It is very similar to the one in the picture that you asked me to look at.
I guess I have found the chip that you need to know about. It was covered by a heatsink and that's why I didn't see it. I hope this is the one. If it is not I will ask a friend to take a good picture of my MB. Please let me know.
The chip that I uncovered says:
Intel *NH82801IR* L7395128 SLA9N
On the board I can also read: Foxconn DG33M03 SE0709 Rev A00
Hope that this helps.
Thank you! Julio
On 20 May 2010 18:12, flashrom-request@flashrom.org wrote:
Send flashrom mailing list submissions to flashrom@flashrom.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to flashrom-request@flashrom.org
You can reach the person managing the list at flashrom-owner@flashrom.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of flashrom digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: disaster (Carl-Daniel Hailfinger)
- Re: disaster (Julio Barrios)
- Re: disaster (Carl-Daniel Hailfinger)
- Re: disaster (Julio Barrios)
- Re: disaster (Guenter)
- TYAN s3992 (Alessandro Gervaso)
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:50:39 +0200 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net To: Julio Barrios jvbn.barrios@yahoo.co.uk, flashrom flashrom@flashrom.org Subject: Re: [flashrom] disaster Message-ID: 4BF513FF.60006@gmx.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Julio,
it seems flashrom@flashrom.org was left out of the conversation by accident. I've added it back, please use the "reply all" button in the future.
On 20.05.2010 12:12, Julio Barrios wrote:
Hi Carl-Daniel, Joseph and Michael,
Many thanks for your replies. I very much appreciate it. I'm not sure if
a
flash chip is the same as the BIOS chip (I'm a complete newbie here and
am
just learning a bit, and destroying computers along the way it seems
LOL!).
Anyway, my BIOS is a Phoenix D686 and my PC is a Dell Inspiron 530.
"Phoenix D686" is probably written on a sticker. Can you peel off the sticker and tell us what's written on the BIOS flash chip?
By the look of things, I guess that I will need to buy a new motherboard.
If
that is the case, then I will need to buy one that is compatible with
linux
because I'm not prepared to give up Ubuntu and go back to Windows.
If you need any more information so that you can help me, please let me know.
Some people/companies in the UK offer services to reflash mainboards. That might be what you want, but I'm not sure if the shipping cost is worth it. Besides that, some vendors might offer top hat flash solutions for your board, but I'm not 100% sure about this.
Again, guys, thanks a lot.
Julio
Good luck!
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 20 May 2010 09:45, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger < c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
Hi Julio,
please note that the method in the link can destroy your mainboard if your flash chip uses a different interface (very likely). See below for details.
On 20.05.2010 09:37, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 20.05.2010 00:44, Joseph Smith wrote:
On 05/19/2010 06:38 PM, Michael Karcher wrote:
IIRC, we recently had a link showing two stacked flash chips (but I think they were parallel, not LPC/FWH) with some control signals only connected to the top one - the idea was to mount a working flash chip
on
top of the one with damaged/wrong contents without removing the lower one from the system. Anyone knows what I'm talking about and still
has
the link?
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2007-April/020384.html
The back-to-back socket solution (sometimes also marketed as top hat flash) would be the one which does not require soldering on the board and thus has a lower risk.
The best way to figure this out is to find out which flash chip you have and tell us. Then we can try to find out which pins need to be bent and disconnected.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:15:15 +0100 From: Julio Barrios jvbn.barrios@yahoo.co.uk To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net Cc: flashrom flashrom@flashrom.org Subject: Re: [flashrom] disaster Message-ID: AANLkTilTQN-bhH1p9ZNKpaKoM1lPNpMhkpFINbRb6RaK@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Carl-Daniel,
Sorry about not sending my message in the correct way.
I have now peeled off the sticker. This is what is on the flash chip:
iTE IT8718F-S 2M24MA L
I hope this means something to you.
Best regarsd,
Julio
On 20 May 2010 11:50, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger < c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
Hi Julio,
it seems flashrom@flashrom.org was left out of the conversation by accident. I've added it back, please use the "reply all" button in the future.
On 20.05.2010 12:12, Julio Barrios wrote:
Hi Carl-Daniel, Joseph and Michael,
Many thanks for your replies. I very much appreciate it. I'm not sure
if
a
flash chip is the same as the BIOS chip (I'm a complete newbie here and
am
just learning a bit, and destroying computers along the way it seems
LOL!).
Anyway, my BIOS is a Phoenix D686 and my PC is a Dell Inspiron 530.
"Phoenix D686" is probably written on a sticker. Can you peel off the sticker and tell us what's written on the BIOS flash chip?
By the look of things, I guess that I will need to buy a new
motherboard.
If
that is the case, then I will need to buy one that is compatible with
linux
because I'm not prepared to give up Ubuntu and go back to Windows.
If you need any more information so that you can help me, please let me know.
Some people/companies in the UK offer services to reflash mainboards. That might be what you want, but I'm not sure if the shipping cost is worth it. Besides that, some vendors might offer top hat flash solutions for your board, but I'm not 100% sure about this.
Again, guys, thanks a lot.
Julio
Good luck!
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 20 May 2010 09:45, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger < c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
Hi Julio,
please note that the method in the link can destroy your mainboard if your flash chip uses a different interface (very likely). See below
for
details.
On 20.05.2010 09:37, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 20.05.2010 00:44, Joseph Smith wrote:
On 05/19/2010 06:38 PM, Michael Karcher wrote:
> IIRC, we recently had a link showing two stacked flash chips (but I > think they were parallel, not LPC/FWH) with some control signals
only
> connected to the top one - the idea was to mount a working flash
chip
>
on
> top of the one with damaged/wrong contents without removing the
lower
> one from the system. Anyone knows what I'm talking about and still
has
> the link? > > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2007-April/020384.html
The back-to-back socket solution (sometimes also marketed as top hat flash) would be the one which does not require soldering on the board and thus has a lower risk.
The best way to figure this out is to find out which flash chip you
have
and tell us. Then we can try to find out which pins need to be bent
and
disconnected.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
Hi, Julio Barrios schrieb:
Thank you for taking the time to look for info about my MB. It is very similar to the one in the picture that you asked me to look at.
I guess I have found the chip that you need to know about. It was covered by a heatsink and that's why I didn't see it. I hope this is the one. If it is not I will ask a friend to take a good picture of my MB. Please let me know.
The chip that I uncovered says:
Intel *NH82801IR* L7395128 SLA9N
That is the ICH9 Southbridge. The Flash chip is _much_ smaller and never under a heatsink. You shold probably look for a small 8-Pin (SPI-) Chip. Could have a "Sticker" on it (BIOS Version).
http://www.foxconnchannel.com/product/Lookimage.aspx?/Upload/Mainboard/20070...
On the Photo its probably the small one all the way left of the white PCI slots.
-- J. Fischer
ps. Re-sending all of a digest as a qoute sucks...