On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 00:37 -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:50 PM, David Woodhouse dwmw2@infradead.org wrote:
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 15:09 -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
Tested with SF100 V:5.1.5 and SF600 V:7.1.4 (with subsequent
patches)
Where are these subsequent patches of which you speak? I have SF600 testers who would be happy to try them out...
I was just referring to the earlier patches that you and Stefan had posted earlier (based off Simon Glass's work): http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2015-July/013759.html
Hm. I could have sworn I'd tried simply disabling the call to dediprog_device_init(), and my SF600Plus tester (FW 7.1.1) still told me it wasn't working — or that it was working for reads but not erase/writes.
Am I missing something more that your patch does?
<insert rant about SCM and code review process>
Yeah. FWIW my set of patches is at http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/flashrom.git — it's not *impossible* to work sanely, even if you are stuck with a project which for some reason is still stuck in the 20th century with Subversion.
-
David Woodhouse