report for AMIC A49LF040A

[Guenter]

Hi,
I've successfully used flashrom to read, write, verify the AMIC 
A49LF040A chip on a PC-Engines Alix 2C3 board. Can you please mark this 
chip as supported?

BTW. I would like to subscribe with this email ([e-mail]) to the 
flashrom-devel list, but unfortunately the mailman interface doesnt work 
for me - I never get the confirmation mail (tried a couple of times, 
also with a gmx account); can you please manually subscribe me?

Thanks, Günter.

Attachment: flashrom verbose output.

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Hi,

On 11.05.2010 15:55, Guenter wrote:
> I would like to subscribe with this email ([e-mail]) to the
> flashrom-devel list, but unfortunately the mailman interface doesnt
> work for me - I never get the confirmation mail (tried a couple of
> times, also with a gmx account); can you please manually subscribe me?

Done.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

[Guenter]

Hi,
find attached the patch for marking the AMIC A49LF040A as tested.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Knauf

[Uwe Hermann]

Hi,

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:43:04AM +0200, Guenter wrote:
> find attached the patch for marking the AMIC A49LF040A as tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Knauf

Oops, sorry, saw your patch too late, chip status is now updated in
r1019 already.

Thanks, Uwe.

Winbond W29EE011 erase works, probe fails

[Guenter]

Hi,
find attached the patch for marking the Winbond W29EE011 as erase 
working, though probe didnt work for me.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Knauf

Winbond W29EE011 erase works, probe fails

[Guenter]

Am 07.06.2010 04:23, schrieb Guenter:
> find attached the patch for marking the Winbond W29EE011 as erase
> working, though probe didnt work for me.

find attached the -V outputs ...
w29ee011_p.txt probe -> failed
all following operations with -c W29EE011
w29ee011_e.txt erase
w29ee011_r.txt read after erase and checking first bytes of the file
w29ee011_w.txt write
w29ee011_v.txt verify

All happened on same machine, therfore a bit strange that the 
"Calibrating delay loop" gives only for the write call 41M while for all 
other operations 200M ...

Gün.

Winbond W29EE011 erase works, probe fails

[Guenter]

Am 07.06.2010 04:40, schrieb Guenter:
> Am 07.06.2010 04:23, schrieb Guenter:
> > find attached the patch for marking the Winbond W29EE011 as erase
> > working, though probe didnt work for me.

and now most crasy thing: I did swap the bios chip, and the original 
chip was detected as W29C011, but while I was testing with the W29EE011 
with exactly same bios content (which I flashed before with an external 
programmer -> copy of content of the original chip) I removed the Award 
sticker, and behold: the chip which was probed as W29C011 is also 
labeled as W29EE011-15, exactly same as the replaced one!! So it seems 
like there are mislabeled chips out in the wild; I checked with Award's 
AFLASH which reported *both* chips as W29EE010 ...

Gün.

Winbond W29EE011 erase works, probe fails

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 07.06.2010 05:47, Guenter wrote:
> Am 07.06.2010 04:40, schrieb Guenter:
> > Am 07.06.2010 04:23, schrieb Guenter:
> > > find attached the patch for marking the Winbond W29EE011 as erase
> > > working, though probe didnt work for me.
>
> and now most crasy thing: I did swap the bios chip, and the original
> chip was detected as W29C011, but while I was testing with the
> W29EE011 with exactly same bios content (which I flashed before with
> an external programmer -> copy of content of the original chip) I
> removed the Award sticker, and behold: the chip which was probed as
> W29C011 is also labeled as W29EE011-15, exactly same as the replaced
> one!! So it seems like there are mislabeled chips out in the wild; I
> checked with Award's AFLASH which reported *both* chips as W29EE010 ...

Interesting. My datasheets say that the W29C011A and the W29EE011 have
identical IDs, and the W29C011A probe function seems to work only by
accident (it contradicts the datasheet).
By the way, our source tree defines W_29C011 and W_29EE011 to the same
value.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

SST39VF010 probe, read, erase, write works

[Guenter]

Hi,
find attached the patch for marking the SST39VF010 as fully working.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Knauf

SST39VF010 probe, read, erase, write works

[Guenter]

Hi,
I found the SST39VF010 as fully working on PC-Engines WRAP-1E board:
http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap1e203.htm

Find attached the output of -V, -r, -E, -W.
Please mark also the WRAP board as supported in the Wiki.

Gün.

SST39VF010 probe, read, erase, write works

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 21.06.2010 16:48, Guenter wrote:
> find attached the patch for marking the SST39VF010 as fully working.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Knauf

Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

Thanks for your patch, committed in r1060.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

SST39VF010 probe, read, erase, write works

[Guenter]

Hi Carl-Daniel,
Am 24.06.2010 13:53, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
> On 21.06.2010 16:48, Guenter wrote:
> > find attached the patch for marking the SST39VF010 as fully working.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Knauf
>
> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
>
> Thanks for your patch, committed in r1060.

so you want to keep the erase warning for now? I did test the erase 
function, followed by a read, and got all 0xff - so it works fine ...

Gün.