Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:10:31AM -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
Hi Willy, You might be interested in another approach that is used in the chromium branch https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom. The "--diff" longopt allows the user to supply a file to diff against the -w argument. This is useful in cases where the user wishes to skip the initial read step, and flashrom will figure out which blocks need to be erased and written thereby eliminating unnecessary erase/write operations as well.
There is some documentation for it here: https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/chromium-os/packages/cros-flashr...
Thank you I'll take a look at it, it can indeed be another solution. The only thing is that it requires the creation of an extra file and I tend to find that it's not always convenient to have to create files for known patterns. However I think that it would be possible based on your approach to provide an option to replace the file with a known pattern for some cases (eg: full of 0xff or full of 0x00, which could be called "assume-clean" or "assume-dirty"), which would achieve the same result and at the same time not change the spirit of your latest work.
Best regards, Willy
Please also see layout patches - https://github.com/stefanct/flashrom/pull/3 + https://github.com/stefanct/flashrom/pull/4 Best regards, Anton Kochkov.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:10:31AM -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
Hi Willy, You might be interested in another approach that is used in the chromium branch https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom. The "--diff" longopt allows the user to supply a file to diff against the -w argument. This is useful in cases where the user wishes to skip the initial read step, and flashrom will figure out which blocks need to be erased and written thereby eliminating unnecessary erase/write operations as well.
There is some documentation for it here: https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/chromium-os/packages/cros-flashr...
Thank you I'll take a look at it, it can indeed be another solution. The only thing is that it requires the creation of an extra file and I tend to find that it's not always convenient to have to create files for known patterns. However I think that it would be possible based on your approach to provide an option to replace the file with a known pattern for some cases (eg: full of 0xff or full of 0x00, which could be called "assume-clean" or "assume-dirty"), which would achieve the same result and at the same time not change the spirit of your latest work.
Best regards, Willy
flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom