Am 15.03.2011 16:29 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Taunerstefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
nicintel_spi.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nicintel_spi.c b/nicintel_spi.c index 3882e81..5a6e04d 100644 --- a/nicintel_spi.c +++ b/nicintel_spi.c @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ const struct pcidev_status nics_intel_spi[] = { {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x105e, OK, "Intel", "82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller"}, {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x107c, OK, "Intel", "82541PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller"}, {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10b9, OK, "Intel", "82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller"},
- {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1076, OK, "Intel", "82541GI Gigabit Ethernet Controller"},
Should we sort by name or by PCI ID? I think we sort by PCI ID everywhere else.
{}, };
Looks good otherwise.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:43:13 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Should we sort by name or by PCI ID? I think we sort by PCI ID everywhere else.
does not really matter in this case anyway ;)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at --- nicintel_spi.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nicintel_spi.c b/nicintel_spi.c index 3882e81..7748e8c 100644 --- a/nicintel_spi.c +++ b/nicintel_spi.c @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ uint8_t *nicintel_spibar;
const struct pcidev_status nics_intel_spi[] = { {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x105e, OK, "Intel", "82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller"}, + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1076, OK, "Intel", "82541GI Gigabit Ethernet Controller"}, {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x107c, OK, "Intel", "82541PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller"}, {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10b9, OK, "Intel", "82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller"},