On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 11:11:16 -0300 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello marcosfrm@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/3 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
hello and thanks for your report! i have added the board to our supported hw list and marked the W49V002A as fully tested and will commit that later.
You are welcome. When should I send "lspci -nnvvxxx" output? Is only "flashrom -V" output sufficient?
well, i would say for all reports that do not involve board enables (i.e. if there is no ""Disabling flash write protection for board" in the output), then flashrom -V is enough. but having the associated lspci data does not hurt (us) at all...
2011/7/4 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
well, i would say for all reports that do not involve board enables (i.e. if there is no ""Disabling flash write protection for board" in the output), then flashrom -V is enough. but having the associated lspci data does not hurt (us) at all...
Here it is.