A first: removal of what might be a working board enable still.
Long story short; it's horrible and i do not want to spend any time on cleaning it up. We have better things to do.
Luc Verhaegen.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:43:50PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
A first: removal of what might be a working board enable still.
Long story short; it's horrible and i do not want to spend any time on cleaning it up. We have better things to do.
Luc Verhaegen.
Remove board enable for the Asus P5A.
Asus P5A was a very popular supersocket7 board more than a decade ago. I'm sure that some people still have some working examples around, but they are getting less and less common. I think that i am pretty much the only one around still who would try to use flashrom for this board.
There's an io line from the Asus AS61256-8 chip to the WP on the flash. But there is no info on this chip. We are using SMBUS on the ALI chip, and while this routine here could be improved a lot, what is the point?
Extra blurp still sitting here in an unsaved buffer: As the author of this horrible board enable, who himself had blow the dust off of this board a few days ago, and who had to reseat quite few things to let it boot; let it rest in peace.
Luc Verhaegen.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:43:50PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
A first: removal of what might be a working board enable still.
Long story short; it's horrible and i do not want to spend any time on cleaning it up. We have better things to do.
No reason to remove it though.
Asus P5A was a very popular supersocket7 board more than a decade ago. I'm sure that some people still have some working examples around, but they are getting less and less common. I think that i am pretty much the only one around still who would try to use flashrom for this board.
Sorry to disappoint you, I have a P5A and also a P5A-B actually :)
There's an io line from the Asus AS61256-8 chip to the WP on the flash. But there is no info on this chip. We are using SMBUS on the ALI chip, and while this routine here could be improved a lot, what is the point?
Signed-off-by: Luc Verhaegen libv@skynet.be
NACK, sorry. I'm fine with improving the code if possible, but dropping a working board-enable for no real reason is a no-go.
Uwe.