On 18.01.2016 00:28, Stefan Tauner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at
I'm not totally happy about not logging the commands during actual compilation. That way, if something fails after the configure phase, we need both a paste from the shell and the debug log file. Anyway...
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:56:46 +0100 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
On 18.01.2016 00:28, Stefan Tauner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at
I'm not totally happy about not logging the commands during actual compilation. That way, if something fails after the configure phase, we need both a paste from the shell and the debug log file.
Well, up to my previous patch we would had to tell the user to edit the makefile (probably multiple times) to get the necessary information at all - which I think I have never done because most of the time our makefile works very well and the libraries we use are widely available (even more so now since we support libftdi 0 and 1... only libusb1 will become a problem for really old systems).
So I don't really think it is needed. However, if we reach a consensus on that we can add it later easily.
Anyway...
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Thanks, r1919.