see attached patch - patch is too small to be copyrightable (if there is such a word).
ciao Joerg
Hi Jörg,
On 23.08.2009 07:50, Joerg Mayer wrote:
see attached patch - patch is too small to be copyrightable (if there is such a word).
It seems the attached patch was not the one declared in the subject.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 01:42:23PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 23.08.2009 07:50, Joerg Mayer wrote:
see attached patch - patch is too small to be copyrightable (if there is such a word).
It seems the attached patch was not the one declared in the subject.
OK, now the correct one - including signed off. While I don't care about the copyright, maybe it helps by guaranteeing that I'm the original author.
Thanks! Joerg
On 24.08.2009 14:50, Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 01:42:23PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 23.08.2009 07:50, Joerg Mayer wrote:
see attached patch - patch is too small to be copyrightable (if there is such a word).
It seems the attached patch was not the one declared in the subject.
OK, now the correct one - including signed off. While I don't care about the copyright, maybe it helps by guaranteeing that I'm the original author.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Mayer jmayer@loplof.de
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net and committed in r700, thanks.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Joerg Mayer