On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:13:54 +0800 alexlu6@mxic.com.tw wrote:
Dear sirs,
This mail comes from Macronix to add the new MX25L6495F flash chipsupport in the flashrom project in order to help the adoption of the chip for Google Chromium OS. Please help to review it. Thanks a lot!
Hello Alex,
I'd like to add support for this chip to vanilla flashrom as well but could not find a public datasheet to add a few additional bits. Will this chip and a respective datasheet be available publicly?
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:25:38 +0100 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:13:54 +0800 alexlu6@mxic.com.tw wrote:
Dear sirs,
This mail comes from Macronix to add the new MX25L6495F flash chipsupport in the flashrom project in order to help the adoption of the chip for Google Chromium OS. Please help to review it. Thanks a lot!
Hello Alex,
I'd like to add support for this chip to vanilla flashrom as well but could not find a public datasheet to add a few additional bits. Will this chip and a respective datasheet be available publicly?
Just for the record if anybody needs some details: Alex has sent me the (confidential) datasheet privately for reference.
I have committed my refined version of the patch in r1867. Thanks again, Alex!
On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:15:26 +0100 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
I have committed my refined version of the patch in r1867. Thanks again, Alex!
Now that we have a build bot again for almost any OS I apparently focused too much on compile tests and not enough on runtime tests... r1867 compiled fine but did not run on any system because the MX25L6495F definition was missing the .vendor field string. Sorry!
Fixed in r1868.
-
Stefan Tauner