On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:49:38 -0700 David Hendricks dhendrix@google.com wrote:
alternatively we could just ignore that problem (it is a future problem after all) and use N25Q064A11 and N25Q064A13.
Please let's not do that :-) It causes headaches if the information presented falls out of date or shows up incorrect.
we cant predict what vendors do. if they decide to give N25Q064B13 another id the .. representation is not correct too. we cant save the world just make it as good as we can :)