Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for Loongson-3A.

[Stefan Tauner]

On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:47:39 -0700
David Hendricks  wrote:
> Hmmm, that return statement seems to be getting rather unwieldy especially
> since we can probably expect a lot more variants. Maybe you can take this
> opportunity to re-factor the code a bit, make a table of known strings, and
> use a loop instead? You could also annotate the table entries to indicate
> whether the processor is known-working and print a warning if not.
>
> Alternately, perhaps it would be sufficient to use strstr() to find
> "GodsonV2", "Loongson-2", and "Loongson-3"?

Yes it's awful... but I want to know if it works first and even then I
think I don't care enough ATM. I had enough string handling in C this
week already :)