X8DTT-H

[Jimmie Tauriainen]

Hi,

This is a Supermicro X8DTT-HIBQF but it uses the same BIOS as X8DTT-H as 
refered in DMI. Probably all H8DTT* boards uses same.

Anyway attaching flashrom -V outputs.

root@spts-10-143:~/flashrom# dmidecode -t baseboard
# dmidecode 2.9
SMBIOS 2.6 present.

Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
Base Board Information
    Manufacturer: Supermicro
    Product Name: X8DTT-H
    Version: 2.0
    Serial Number: 1234567890
    Asset Tag: 1234567890
    Features:
    	Board is a hosting board
    	Board is replaceable
    Location In Chassis: 1234567890
    Chassis Handle: 0x0003
    Type: Motherboard
    Contained Object Handles: 0

Best regards,
Jimmie

[Michael Fuckner]

On 12/21/2011 02:20 PM, Jimmie Tauriainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Supermicro X8DTT-HIBQF but it uses the same BIOS as X8DTT-H as
> refered in DMI. Probably all H8DTT* boards uses same.

All X8DTT-H* use the same Bios, the Versions without Hot-Swap Support 
(X8DTT*) use different Bios- as well as X8DTT-INFF with DDR-Infiniband.

Regards,
  Michael!

[Idwer Vollering]

Hi,

2011/12/21 Jimmie Tauriainen :
> Hi,
>
> This is a Supermicro X8DTT-HIBQF but it uses the same BIOS as X8DTT-H as
> refered in DMI. Probably all H8DTT* boards uses same.
>
> Anyway attaching flashrom -V outputs.

Can you attach the output of 'lspci -nnvvvxxx' and 'superiotool -deV'
(run as root) as well? Some code needs to be written to clear the
erase/write protection, see http://flashrom.org/Board_Enable
> root@spts-10-143:~/flashrom# dmidecode -t baseboard
> # dmidecode 2.9
> SMBIOS 2.6 present.
>
> Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
> Base Board Information
>        Manufacturer: Supermicro
>        Product Name: X8DTT-H
>        Version: 2.0
>        Serial Number: 1234567890
>        Asset Tag: 1234567890
>        Features:
>                Board is a hosting board
>                Board is replaceable
>        Location In Chassis: 1234567890
>        Chassis Handle: 0x0003
>        Type: Motherboard
>        Contained Object Handles: 0
>
> Best regards,
> Jimmie
>
> flashrom mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

[Stefan Tauner]

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:20:15 +0100
Jimmie Tauriainen  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Supermicro X8DTT-HIBQF but it uses the same BIOS as X8DTT-H as 
> refered in DMI. Probably all H8DTT* boards uses same.
>
> Anyway attaching flashrom -V outputs.

hmmm
Sorry for the late reply. I just notices that you were using r1478,
which had one important fix missing which was added in r1479. maybe that
did not actually matter, but i would try anyway with a current
snapshot or 0.9.4.
You have read a backup file... did you look at the contents? How big is
it?

[Jimmie Tauriainen]

No problem, haven't had access to the machine under the new year circus.
Is it only the Verbose outputs you need? Attaching them with latest SVN
build.

flashrom seems a lot more cleaner now, thanks for the good work. ;)

Best regards,
Jimmie

On 2012-01-02 23:30, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:20:15 +0100
> Jimmie Tauriainen  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a Supermicro X8DTT-HIBQF but it uses the same BIOS as X8DTT-H as 
> > refered in DMI. Probably all H8DTT* boards uses same.
> >
> > Anyway attaching flashrom -V outputs.
>
> hmmm
> Sorry for the late reply. I just notices that you were using r1478,
> which had one important fix missing which was added in r1479. maybe that
> did not actually matter, but i would try anyway with a current
> snapshot or 0.9.4.
> You have read a backup file... did you look at the contents? How big is
> it?

[Stefan Tauner]

On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:52:06 +0100
Jimmie Tauriainen  wrote:
> No problem, haven't had access to the machine under the new year circus.
> Is it only the Verbose outputs you need? Attaching them with latest SVN
> build.
>
> flashrom seems a lot more cleaner now, thanks for the good work. ;)

Hello Jimmie,

thanks for retesting! So this was all due to that "unrelated" bug...
good. I have marked the mainboard as working and will commit that later
together with other small changes, thanks.
> On 2012-01-02 23:30, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> > hmmm
> > Sorry for the late reply. I just notices that you were using r1478,
> > which had one important fix missing which was added in r1479. maybe that
> > did not actually matter, but i would try anyway with a current
> > snapshot or 0.9.4.
> > You have read a backup file... did you look at the contents? How big is
> > it?