If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there. Handle these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips, but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times until they are added to flashchips.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Index: flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/flashchips.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/flashchips.c (Revision 664) +++ flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/flashchips.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -3167,5 +3167,32 @@ .read = NULL, },
+ { + .vendor = "Generic", + .name = "unknown SPI chip (RDID)", + .bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_SPI, + .manufacture_id = GENERIC_MANUF_ID, + .model_id = GENERIC_DEVICE_ID, + .total_size = 0, + .page_size = 256, + .tested = TEST_BAD_PREW, + .probe = probe_spi_rdid, + .erase = NULL, + .write = NULL, + }, + { + .vendor = "Generic", + .name = "unknown SPI chip (REMS)", + .bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_SPI, + .manufacture_id = GENERIC_MANUF_ID, + .model_id = GENERIC_DEVICE_ID, + .total_size = 0, + .page_size = 256, + .tested = TEST_BAD_PREW, + .probe = probe_spi_rems, + .erase = NULL, + .write = NULL, + }, + { NULL } }; Index: flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/flashchips.h =================================================================== --- flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/flashchips.h (Revision 664) +++ flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/flashchips.h (Arbeitskopie) @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ * SPI parts have 16-bit device IDs if they support RDID. */
+#define GENERIC_MANUF_ID 0xffff /* Check if there is a vendor ID */ #define GENERIC_DEVICE_ID 0xffff /* Only match the vendor ID */
#define ALLIANCE_ID 0x52 /* Alliance Semiconductor */ Index: flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/spi.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/spi.c (Revision 664) +++ flashrom-spi_totally_generic_probe/spi.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -274,6 +274,11 @@ GENERIC_DEVICE_ID == flash->model_id) return 1;
+ /* Test if there is any vendor ID. */ + if (GENERIC_MANUF_ID == flash->manufacture_id && + id1 != 0xff) + return 1; + return 0; }
@@ -329,6 +334,11 @@ GENERIC_DEVICE_ID == flash->model_id) return 1;
+ /* Test if there is any vendor ID. */ + if (GENERIC_MANUF_ID == flash->manufacture_id && + id1 != 0xff) + return 1; + return 0; }
On 23.07.2009 04:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there. Handle these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips, but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times until they are added to flashchips.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Ping?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 01.10.2009 11:10, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 23.07.2009 04:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there. Handle these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips, but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times until they are added to flashchips.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Ping?
Ping? This is the oldest unapplied and unacked patch. It was posted almost 4 months ago. (And a on the coreboot list before that.) http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/67/ if you can't find the patch anymore.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
On 01.10.2009 11:10, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 23.07.2009 04:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there. Handle these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips, but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times until they are added to flashchips.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Ping?
Ping? This is the oldest unapplied and unacked patch. It was posted almost 4 months ago. (And a on the coreboot list before that.) http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/67/ if you can't find the patch anymore.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
I have no way to test the generic read but the code looks fine. Acked-by: Marc Jones marcj303@gmail.com
On 19.11.2009 18:27, Marc Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
On 01.10.2009 11:10, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 23.07.2009 04:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there. Handle these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips, but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times until they are added to flashchips.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
I have no way to test the generic read but the code looks fine. Acked-by: Marc Jones marcj303@gmail.com
Thanks, r767.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Marc Jones