22 Aug
2011
22 Aug
'11
11:12 a.m.
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:39:46 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
- if (rwperms != 0x3)
msg_pdbg(")\n0x%08x-0x%08x is %s\n", (ICH_FREG_BASE(pr) << 12),(ICH_FREG_LIMIT(pr) << 12) | 0x0fff,access_names[rwperms]);
this is wrong. i have rebased these patches onto hwseq and forgot that the FREG macros have changed (no more shifting needed). depending on what gets acked when, i will fix this one way or another...
--
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner