flashrom

flashrom@flashrom.org

7 participants
9163 discussions

Re: [flashrom] EON EN29F002NT-70P - Erase/Write OK
by Stefan Tauner 14 Oct '11

14 Oct '11

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:13:00 -0300 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Tested (via hot swap) using the PCCHIPS reported in my previous email. > > Marcos EON EN29F002(A)(N)T is marked as TEST_OK_PREW now, thanks -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Re: [flashrom] SyncMOS F29C51002T-90PC - Write OK
by Stefan Tauner 14 Oct '11

14 Oct '11

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:07:40 -0300 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Tested (via hot swap) using the PCCHIPS reported in my previous email. > > Marcos thanks, marked as TEST_OK_PREW now. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Re: [flashrom] PCCHIPS M598LMR (V9.0) - OK
by Stefan Tauner 14 Oct '11

14 Oct '11

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:52:59 -0300 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > PCCHIPS M598LMR boards were incredibly popular in Brazil ~12 years ago. > > There were, as usual from PCCHIPS, several hardware revisions. Some I > remeber are 1.3, 5.0, 6.0, and 9.0. The difference between them is not > very clear, but as a general rule the latest BIOS (2K1222S.ROM) > applies to all of them, with one exception: if it use an ASD AE29F2008 > or Winbond W29C020 flash, the 2K1222S.ROM BIOS will *not* work (the > board will not complete POST). In case you have one of those chips, > you should use the 2K0930S.ROM BIOS which works fine. > > Mine has an ASD AE29F2008-12 flash (detected as "Winbond > W29C020(C)/W29C022" by flashrom) and I successfully programmed the > 2K0930S.ROM BIOS. > > Logs attached. > > Marcos hello marcos and thanks for the report(s)! i have marked the board as supported and also the sis chipset to be tested. the (mis)detection of the flash chip is expected. the ASD chip uses the same ID (and is hopefully a drop-in replacement which behaves identically). -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Spec for Lenovo n200 flash enable
by Joshua Roys 14 Oct '11

14 Oct '11

Hello, Please find attached a specification that when implemented should allow flash access on the Lenovo n200 laptop. Graceful EC restart was not investigated. As a side note, compal has a nice set of EC KBD commands that allow a program to query the EC type (ENE KB926, NSC PC87570, ...) that might eventually allow a generic compal laptop enable. More investigation needed. Joshua Roys

1 0

EON EN29F002NT-70P - Erase/Write OK
by Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello 13 Oct '11

13 Oct '11

Tested (via hot swap) using the PCCHIPS reported in my previous email. Marcos

1 0

SyncMOS F29C51002T-90PC - Write OK
by Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello 13 Oct '11

13 Oct '11

Tested (via hot swap) using the PCCHIPS reported in my previous email. Marcos

1 0

PCCHIPS M598LMR (V9.0) - OK
by Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello 13 Oct '11

13 Oct '11

PCCHIPS M598LMR boards were incredibly popular in Brazil ~12 years ago. There were, as usual from PCCHIPS, several hardware revisions. Some I remeber are 1.3, 5.0, 6.0, and 9.0. The difference between them is not very clear, but as a general rule the latest BIOS (2K1222S.ROM) applies to all of them, with one exception: if it use an ASD AE29F2008 or Winbond W29C020 flash, the 2K1222S.ROM BIOS will *not* work (the board will not complete POST). In case you have one of those chips, you should use the 2K0930S.ROM BIOS which works fine. Mine has an ASD AE29F2008-12 flash (detected as "Winbond W29C020(C)/W29C022" by flashrom) and I successfully programmed the 2K0930S.ROM BIOS. Logs attached. Marcos

1 0

FlashRom and Intel C204 chipset.
by Andrey V. Bondarenko 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

Hello, Verbose output is in the attachment file for chipset Intel C204. I sent this e-mail because it was suggested to send report. # ./flashrom --read ./P8B-E-4L-ASUS-0602.ROM flashrom v0.9.4-r1395 on Linux 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.028stab094.3 (x86_64), built with libpci 3.1.7, GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51), little endian flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org Calibrating delay loop... OK. Found chipset "Intel C204". This chipset is marked as untested. If you are using an up-to-date version of flashrom please email a report to flashrom(a)flashrom.org including a verbose (-V) log. Thank you! Enabling flash write... OK. This chipset supports the following protocols: FWH, SPI. Found Winbond flash chip "W25Q64" (8192 kB, SPI) at physical address 0xff800000. Reading flash... Transaction error! Read operation failed! FAILED.

1 0

Re: [flashrom] Add timeout check to SPI bitbang bus request
by GatoLoko 11 Oct '11

11 Oct '11

-------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Re: [flashrom] Add timeout check to SPI bitbang bus request Fecha: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:22:17 +0200 De: GatoLoko <GatoLoko(a)gmail.com> Para: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> El 11/10/11 14:42, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger escribió: > Here is an updated timeout patch (no functional changes for > nicintel_spi). A year has passed, and I'm still trying to find someone > who can test and ack it. > > GatoLoko: This new patch also addresses the SB600 timeout issue you were > seeing. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> Tested it, and seems to work, but the timeout feels a little too long. It took half an hour to complete a pass where no chip was found. The chip is a MX25L4005APC-12G. There was a few "strange" messages, don't know if they are related. The messages are: "Not unmapping zero size at 0xffffffffffffffff" and: """ Probing for ST M25P40-old, 512 kB: sb600_spi_send_command, cmd=9f, writecnt=0, readcnt=3 Writing: SB600 FIFO pointer is 0, wanted 0 Executing: SB600: execute_command timeout! sb600_spi_send_command, cmd=90, writecnt=3, readcnt=2 Writing: [00][00][00] SB600 FIFO pointer corruption! Pointer is 0, wanted 3 Something else is accessing the flash chip and causes random corruption. Please stop all applications and drivers and IPMI which access the flash chip. sb600_spi_send_command, cmd=ab, writecnt=3, readcnt=1 Writing: [00][00][00] SB600 FIFO pointer corruption! Pointer is 0, wanted 3 Something else is accessing the flash chip and causes random corruption. Please stop all applications and drivers and IPMI which access the flash chip. """ Attached is a full pass log. -- GatoLoko

1 0

Re: [flashrom] Problem with coreboot and flashrom
by Bernd Blaauw 10 Oct '11

10 Oct '11

Op 10-10-2011 17:57, Николай Пономарев schreef: > I was flashed bios with coreboot and after that network card, usb, > video card not working. flashrom not working too, it start flash bios > and stop at probing chip. Can anybody help me? > Mother board: http://www.gigabyte.ru/products/page/mb/ga-ma78gm-s2h_11 You're likely best off flashing back to vendor BIOS and/or replacing the BIOS flash chip (eeprom) by another one containing the motherboard manufacturer's BIOS. Alternatively a 2nd machine might help in performing a so-called hotswap. I've got no usage experience with CoreBoot (only reading their mailinglist archives), don't know if your board is supported at all (and if not, hopefully you've got a BIOS backup chip), and you're likely best off asking the Coreboot mailing list. Flashrom can often write Coreboot firmware, but also motherboard vendor firmware (bios/uefi). That might be one of the reasons that it's not that related/integrated to the Coreboot project anymore as it once was. Goodluck unbricking your BIOS. Some experimenting inside of QEMU might work, pity there's no ready-to-run 'coreboot-linux' harddisk image file (or virtual machine) available for download, to run directly under QEMU.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom