Hi,
I had to modify my copy a bit to use the PLCC chips I had salvaged
somewhere as boot ROMs in Intel NICs. Patch attached.
I'm not sure if the 512kB one qualifies as tested because the programmer
only supports 128kB, and I had to --force it.
regards,
andreas
Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
> Some vendors forget to disable regions properly and set their FRAP bits
> and FREG to 0. While not documented publicly this is being ignored by the
> chipset(s)[1] and hence flashrom should do so too. Without this patch
> flashrom prints a warning and disables writes.
> The check for i (region index) excludes the descriptor region which should
> not be becessary because specs suggest that the descriptor region should not
> be locked, but if vendors would follow the specs this patch would not have
> been necessary in the first place.
>
> [1]: http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2012-May/009303.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at>
> ---
> Justin, you could help testing this patch by applying it to the latest
> development source from http://flashrom.org/Downloads and sending us
> the flashrom output as before.
I'll try this out in the next week or so. Thanks for looking into this.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:03:34 -0700
Greg Schardt <gschardt(a)ddn.com> wrote:
> I apologize for the delay.
likewise ;)
> Here is the output:
>
> 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation Patsburg LPC Controller [8086:1d41] (rev 06)
>
> Let me know if you need more information or would like me to test it.
that one actually is already supported since september 2011, so the
latest stable version should detect it and work correctly (as long as
there are no locked regions).
--
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
I plan to tag and release flashrom 0.9.6 Real Soon Now (tm).
If you need anything merged, tell me NOW.
flashrom svn HEAD doesn't have any known regressions compared to 0.9.5,
so it seems stable enough to ship.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:24:19 -0700
David Hendricks <dhendrix(a)google.com> wrote:
> This seems trivial, as internal_init() already does the right thing when a
> return value is used here.
indeed.
thanks niklas! i have applied it in r1557.
--
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner