flashrom August 2011

flashrom@flashrom.org

42 participants
219 discussions

[commit] r1421 - trunk
by repository service 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

Author: uwe Date: Fri Aug 26 00:54:23 2011 New Revision: 1421 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1421 Log: Mark the AMD Am29LV008BB chip as fully tested. Thanks Mattias Mattsson <vitplister(a)gmail.com> for the report. http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-July/007423.html Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Modified: trunk/flashchips.c Modified: trunk/flashchips.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashchips.c Fri Aug 26 00:44:11 2011 (r1420) +++ trunk/flashchips.c Fri Aug 26 00:54:23 2011 (r1421) @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ .total_size = 1024, .page_size = 64 * 1024, /* unused */ .feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_2AA | FEATURE_SHORT_RESET, - .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, + .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, .probe = probe_jedec, .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, .block_erasers =

1 0

Re: [flashrom] flashrom on PowerPC (002-lh28f008bjt.patch)
by Stefan Tauner 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:20:19 +0200 Mattias Mattsson <vitplister(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Index: 82802ab.c > =================================================================== > --- 82802ab.c (revision 1396) > +++ 82802ab.c (working copy) > @@ -208,3 +208,56 @@ > > return 0; > } > + > +int unlock_lh28f008bjt(struct flashchip *flash) > +{ > + chipaddr bios = flash->virtual_memory; > + uint8_t mcfg, bcfg, need_unlock = 0, can_unlock = 0; mixing initialized and declared-only variables is :( > + int i; > + > + /* Wait if chip is busy */ > + wait_82802ab(flash); > + > + /* Read identifier codes */ > + chip_writeb(0x90, bios); > + > + /* Read master lock-bit */ > + mcfg = chip_readb(bios + 0x3); > + msg_cdbg("master lock is "); > + if (mcfg) { > + msg_cdbg("locked!\n"); > + } else { > + msg_cdbg("unlocked!\n"); > + can_unlock = 1; > + } > + > + /* Read block lock-bits, 8 * 8 KiB + 15 * 64 KiB */ although correct, we don't use the IEC prefixes nowhere else... > + for (i = 0; i < flash->total_size * 1024; i+= (i >= (64 * 1024) ? 64 * 1024 : 8 * 1024)) { hm... line limit. looks very odd at first sight. maybe a while loop would be better? > + bcfg = chip_readb(bios + i + 2); // read block lock config /* */? not that i find this convention necessary... > + msg_cdbg("block lock at %06x is %slocked!\n", i, bcfg ? "" : "un"); > + if (bcfg) { > + need_unlock = 1; > + } > + } > + > + /* Reset chip */ > + chip_writeb(0xFF, bios); > + > + /* Unlock: clear block lock-bits, if needed */ > + if (can_unlock && need_unlock) { > + msg_cdbg("Unlock: "); > + chip_writeb(0x60, bios); > + chip_writeb(0xD0, bios); > + chip_writeb(0xFF, bios); > + wait_82802ab(flash); > + msg_cdbg("Done!\n"); > + } > + > + /* Error: master locked or a block is locked */ > + if (!can_unlock && need_unlock) { > + msg_cerr("At least one block is locked and lockdown is active!\n"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} you start messages lower-case and end them with an exclamation mark very often. we usually do this for errors (or warnings) only. > Index: flashchips.c > =================================================================== > --- flashchips.c (revision 1396) > +++ flashchips.c (working copy) > @@ -5379,6 +5379,36 @@ > > { > .vendor = "Sharp", > + .name = "LH28F008BJT-BTLZ1", why the -BTLZ1 suffix? i have just looked briefly at the LH28F008BJT-BTLZ1 and LH28F008BJT-BTLZC datasheets, but they seem to be almost identical? > + .bustype = BUS_PARALLEL, > + .manufacture_id = SHARP_ID, > + .model_id = SHARP_LH28F008BJxxPB, i am not sure about those id names either, but they are not as important because they are not visible to the user. > + .total_size = 1024, > + .page_size = 64 * 1024, > + .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, > + .probe = probe_82802ab, > + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, > + .block_erasers = > + { > + { > + .eraseblocks = { > + {8 * 1024, 8}, > + {64 * 1024, 15} > + }, > + .block_erase = erase_block_82802ab, > + }, { > + .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} }, > + .block_erase = erase_sector_49lfxxxc, > + } > + }, > + .unlock = unlock_lh28f008bjt, > + .write = write_82802ab, > + .read = read_memmapped, > + .voltage = {2700, 3600}, > + }, > + > + { > + .vendor = "Sharp", > .name = "LHF00L04", > .bustype = BUS_FWH, /* A/A Mux */ > .manufacture_id = SHARP_ID, > Index: chipdrivers.h > =================================================================== > --- chipdrivers.h (revision 1396) > +++ chipdrivers.h (working copy) > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ > void print_status_82802ab(uint8_t status); > int unlock_82802ab(struct flashchip *flash); > int unlock_28f004s5(struct flashchip *flash); > +int unlock_lh28f008bjt(struct flashchip *flash); > > /* jedec.c */ > uint8_t oddparity(uint8_t val); -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

3 2

[commit] r1420 - trunk
by repository service 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

Author: uwe Date: Fri Aug 26 00:44:11 2011 New Revision: 1420 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1420 Log: Add support for the Sharp LH28F008BJT-BTLZ1 chip. Tested by Mattias Mattsson <vitplister(a)gmail.com> on a PowerPC box. Signed-off-by: Mattias Mattsson <vitplister(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006(a)gmx.net> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe(a)hermann-uwe.de> Modified: trunk/82802ab.c trunk/chipdrivers.h trunk/flashchips.c Modified: trunk/82802ab.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/82802ab.c Thu Aug 25 16:06:50 2011 (r1419) +++ trunk/82802ab.c Fri Aug 26 00:44:11 2011 (r1420) @@ -208,3 +208,58 @@ return 0; } + +int unlock_lh28f008bjt(struct flashchip *flash) +{ + chipaddr bios = flash->virtual_memory; + uint8_t mcfg, bcfg; + uint8_t need_unlock = 0, can_unlock = 0; + int i; + + /* Wait if chip is busy */ + wait_82802ab(flash); + + /* Read identifier codes */ + chip_writeb(0x90, bios); + + /* Read master lock-bit */ + mcfg = chip_readb(bios + 0x3); + msg_cdbg("master lock is "); + if (mcfg) { + msg_cdbg("locked!\n"); + } else { + msg_cdbg("unlocked!\n"); + can_unlock = 1; + } + + /* Read block lock-bits, 8 * 8 KB + 15 * 64 KB */ + for (i = 0; i < flash->total_size * 1024; + i += (i >= (64 * 1024) ? 64 * 1024 : 8 * 1024)) { + bcfg = chip_readb(bios + i + 2); /* read block lock config */ + msg_cdbg("block lock at %06x is %slocked!\n", i, + bcfg ? "" : "un"); + if (bcfg) + need_unlock = 1; + } + + /* Reset chip */ + chip_writeb(0xFF, bios); + + /* Unlock: clear block lock-bits, if needed */ + if (can_unlock && need_unlock) { + msg_cdbg("Unlock: "); + chip_writeb(0x60, bios); + chip_writeb(0xD0, bios); + chip_writeb(0xFF, bios); + wait_82802ab(flash); + msg_cdbg("Done!\n"); + } + + /* Error: master locked or a block is locked */ + if (!can_unlock && need_unlock) { + msg_cerr("At least one block is locked and lockdown is active!\n"); + return -1; + } + + return 0; +} Modified: trunk/chipdrivers.h ============================================================================== --- trunk/chipdrivers.h Thu Aug 25 16:06:50 2011 (r1419) +++ trunk/chipdrivers.h Fri Aug 26 00:44:11 2011 (r1420) @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ void print_status_82802ab(uint8_t status); int unlock_82802ab(struct flashchip *flash); int unlock_28f004s5(struct flashchip *flash); +int unlock_lh28f008bjt(struct flashchip *flash); /* jedec.c */ uint8_t oddparity(uint8_t val); Modified: trunk/flashchips.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/flashchips.c Thu Aug 25 16:06:50 2011 (r1419) +++ trunk/flashchips.c Fri Aug 26 00:44:11 2011 (r1420) @@ -5379,6 +5379,36 @@ { .vendor = "Sharp", + .name = "LH28F008BJT-BTLZ1", + .bustype = BUS_PARALLEL, + .manufacture_id = SHARP_ID, + .model_id = SHARP_LH28F008BJxxPB, + .total_size = 1024, + .page_size = 64 * 1024, + .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, + .probe = probe_82802ab, + .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, + .block_erasers = + { + { + .eraseblocks = { + {8 * 1024, 8}, + {64 * 1024, 15} + }, + .block_erase = erase_block_82802ab, + }, { + .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} }, + .block_erase = erase_sector_49lfxxxc, + } + }, + .unlock = unlock_lh28f008bjt, + .write = write_82802ab, + .read = read_memmapped, + .voltage = {2700, 3600}, + }, + + { + .vendor = "Sharp", .name = "LHF00L04", .bustype = BUS_FWH, /* A/A Mux */ .manufacture_id = SHARP_ID,

1 0

Re: [flashrom] Coreboot failure on GA-MA78GM-S2HP Rev. 2.0 motherboard
by QingPei Wang 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

that may because of the dual bios method which used by gigabyte, since the slave spi chip is still on the board, the superio may(i guess)detect the CRC error for the main spi bios is changed(coreboot now). you can try to remove the slave spi flash chip. no sure if it works Best wishes Wang Qing Pei Phone: 86+018930528086 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Donovan Lavinder <drmario2007(a)gmail.com>wrote: > I originally wanted EFI and other features that will allow me to use my > motherboard for few years out. So, I downloaded archived coreboot firmware > package, and I found one "baked" firmware ROM under folder MA78GM as the > motherboards under this family seems to be having the same chipsets, so I > went to burn my own coreboot in FreeDOS using flashrom. Now, it first > exclaimed that it found MXIC MX25L8005 chipset, but it tried 4-bytes RDID > and failed, however, I was able to erase the BIOS chip fine. Next, I wrote > the firmware - after it said "done", it froze - I reset it, it kept > reverting back to oh-so-annoying Award BIOS... No wonder my motherboard is > SO picky! > > Here, I wrote up on the paper: > flashrom Ver. 0.9.3 - r1205 (on Freedos boot CD - all I have had, no floppy > disk and it won't boot from USB disk.... I may try spare hard drive if > needed...) > - 4-byte RDID refusal (although erasure was successful) > Motherboard: Vendor - Gigabyte / Model - GA-MA78GM-S2HP > CPU: AMD Phenom II X940 Black Series 3.0GHz quad-core (Deneb) CPU > RAM: Crucial Ballistix DDR-II 800MHz 1GB x2 (2GB) on dual-channel memory > bus > Video card: Vendor - Gigabyte / Model - GV-R467ZL-1GI - FW Ver. - F12 / VPU > - AMD Radeon HD 4670 with 1GB 800MHz GDDR3 on 128-bit bus > * I removed my hard drive (with my personal documents and Windows XP) > during the firmware flash to ensure the data aren't touched in a way. > > I would like to know how I can get my motherboard to quit being all so > picky - otherwise any other methods known to work perfectly on the > GA-MA78GM-S2HP motherboard any of you may have up and running the coreboot > firmware. > > Thanks for your help! > > -- > "Mamma-mia, there's Koopa troopa in Mushroom Kingdom!" > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom >

1 0

[PATCH]add AMD hudson support
by QingPei Wang 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

The HUDSON has different vendor & device id than SBx00. The ids are got by lspci. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Pei <wangqingpei(a)gmail.com> Index: chipset_enable.c =================================================================== --- chipset_enable.c (revision 1419) +++ chipset_enable.c (working copy) @@ -1052,6 +1052,7 @@ {0x1002, 0x4377, OK, "ATI", "SB400", enable_flash_sb400}, {0x1002, 0x438d, OK, "AMD", "SB600", enable_flash_sb600}, {0x1002, 0x439d, OK, "AMD", "SB700/SB710/SB750/SB850", enable_flash_sb600}, + {0x1002, 0x780e, OK, "AMD", "HUDSON", enable_flash_sb600}, {0x100b, 0x0510, NT, "AMD", "SC1100", enable_flash_sc1100}, {0x1022, 0x2080, OK, "AMD", "CS5536", enable_flash_cs5536}, {0x1022, 0x2090, OK, "AMD", "CS5536", enable_flash_cs5536}, Index: sb600spi.c =================================================================== --- sb600spi.c (revision 1419) +++ sb600spi.c (working copy) @@ -259,8 +259,11 @@ smbus_dev = pci_dev_find(0x1002, 0x4385); if (!smbus_dev) { - msg_perr("ERROR: SMBus device not found. Not enabling SPI.\n"); - return ERROR_NONFATAL; + smbus_dev = pci_dev_find(0x1022,0x780b); /*HUDSON*/ + if(!smbus_dev){ + msg_perr("ERROR: SMBus device not found. Not enabling SPI.\n"); + return ERROR_NONFATAL; + } } /* Note about the bit tests below: If a bit is zero, the GPIO is SPI. */ Best wishes Wang Qing Pei Phone: 86+018930528086

1 0

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] dmi: add "Sealed-case PC" to the list of non-laptop chassis
by Stefan Tauner 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:44:22 +0200 Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/8/22 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at>: > > --- > > not sure though if all other computers with that chassis type are "in all > > likelihood not a laptop". > > This writeup looks rather convincing: > http://www.novell.com/communities/node/3519/adding-more-addon-image-files-b… > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at> > > Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> thanks, i am not fully convinced though, but i have added it to my tested_stuff branch for now, so others can still veto for a while :) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Add board enable for ASUS P5LP-LE
by Stefan Tauner 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:19:33 +0200 Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> r1419, thanks. i have changed it a bit though: i had to rename the board names of the board enable, because the print.c code is not able to cope with multiple boards with the same name, resulting in output like: ASUS P5LP-LE OK (autodetected)(autodetected) i hope everyone can live with the result :) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

[commit] r1419 - trunk
by repository service 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

Author: stefanct Date: Thu Aug 25 16:06:50 2011 New Revision: 1419 URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1419 Log: Add board enable for ASUS P5LP-LE Based on the REing of Michael Karcher and a good guess of Idwer Vollering. Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom(a)mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at> Tested-by: Leon Zhang <leoncamel at gmail.com> http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-August/004500.html Tested-by: medhi <nefkongo(a)hotmail.com> http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=779 Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> --- i have added the DMI match and changed the board enable and wiki comments a bit. i am not sure if this is the right way to add it, because there are so many variations, but we can change that later too. Modified: trunk/board_enable.c trunk/print.c Modified: trunk/board_enable.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/board_enable.c Sat Aug 20 16:16:00 2011 (r1418) +++ trunk/board_enable.c Thu Aug 25 16:06:50 2011 (r1419) @@ -1517,6 +1517,9 @@ /* * Suited for: * - ASUS A8Jm (laptop): Intel 945 + ICH7 + * - ASUS P5LP-LE used in ... + * - HP Media Center m7270.fr Desktop PC as "Lithium-UL8E" + * - Epson Endeavor MT7700 */ static int intel_ich_gpio34_raise(void) { @@ -2024,6 +2027,8 @@ {0x8086, 0x266a, 0x1043, 0x80a6, 0x8086, 0x2668, 0x1043, 0x814e, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5GD1 Pro", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio21_raise}, {0x8086, 0x266a, 0x1043, 0x80a6, 0x8086, 0x2668, 0x1043, 0x813d, "^P5GD2-Premium$", NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5GD2 Premium", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio21_raise}, {0x8086, 0x266a, 0x1043, 0x80a6, 0x8086, 0x2668, 0x1043, 0x813d, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5GDC Deluxe", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio21_raise}, + {0x8086, 0x27b8, 0x103c, 0x2a22, 0x8086, 0x2770, 0x103c, 0x2a22, "^LITHIUM$", NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5LP-LE (Lithium-UL8E)",0, OK, intel_ich_gpio34_raise}, + {0x8086, 0x27b8, 0x1043, 0x2a22, 0x8086, 0x2770, 0x1043, 0x2a22, "^P5LP-LE$", NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5LP-LE (Epson OEM)", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio34_raise}, {0x8086, 0x27da, 0x1043, 0x8179, 0x8086, 0x27b8, 0x1043, 0x8179, "^P5LD2$", NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5LD2", 0, NT, intel_ich_gpio16_raise}, {0x10DE, 0x0030, 0x1043, 0x818a, 0x8086, 0x100E, 0x1043, 0x80EE, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5ND2-SLI Deluxe", 0, OK, nvidia_mcp_gpio10_raise}, {0x8086, 0x24dd, 0x1043, 0x80a6, 0x8086, 0x2570, 0x1043, 0x8157, NULL, NULL, NULL, P3, "ASUS", "P5PE-VM", 0, OK, intel_ich_gpio21_raise}, Modified: trunk/print.c ============================================================================== --- trunk/print.c Sat Aug 20 16:16:00 2011 (r1418) +++ trunk/print.c Thu Aug 25 16:06:50 2011 (r1419) @@ -483,6 +483,9 @@ B("ASUS", "P5KC", 1, "http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=fFZ8oUIGmLpwNMjj", NULL), B("ASUS", "P5L-MX", 1, "http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=X70d3NCzH2DE9vWH", NULL), B("ASUS", "P5LD2", 0, NULL, "Untested board enable."), + B("ASUS", "P5LP-LE (Lithium-UL8E)", 1, "http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c00379616&tmp_task=prod…", "This is an OEM board from HP."), + B("ASUS", "P5LP-LE (Epson OEM)", 1, NULL, "This is an OEM board from Epson (e.g. Endeavor MT7700)."), + B("ASUS", "P5LP-LE", 0, NULL, "This designation is used for OEM boards from HP, Epson and maybe others. The HP names vary and not all of them have been tested yet. Please report any success or failure, thanks."), B("ASUS", "P5GD1 Pro", 1, "http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=50M49xQh71EZOeM1", NULL), B("ASUS", "P5N-E SLI", 0, "http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=KyHOsOKWujC2QguJ", "Needs a board enable (http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/3298/)."), B("ASUS", "P5N32-E SLI", 1, "http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=vBZLIBtPzYB2bLcb", NULL),

1 0

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] Make the laptop warning less scary if unsure
by Idwer Vollering 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

2011/8/20 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at>: > Telling the user to use "force_I_want_a_brick" if it is not even a > laptop, is a bit over-the-top. Introduce a new laptop parameter > "this_is_not_a_laptop" that allows to force operation, but only if > the detection is not sure. > > --- > > complicates the whole thing a bit. could do without the extra > variable and new part of the if condition, if we allow the > this_is_not_a_laptop parameter to always work, not only if the > laptop detection is uncertain. it will be undocumented and only > visible to the user together with the warning anyway... I was curious whether the currently present overriding parameter works in combination with the parameter in this patch, and it does: $ sudo ./flashrom -V -p internal:laptop=force_I_want_a_brick -p internal:laptop=this_is_not_a_laptop flashrom v0.9.4-r1418 on FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 (i386), built with libpci 3.1.7, GCC 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD], little endian (etcetera) Do you think this behaviour is desired? > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at> > --- > internal.c | 14 ++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/internal.c b/internal.c > index 846cf1e..5ff605e 100644 > --- a/internal.c > +++ b/internal.c > @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ int internal_init(void) > int ret = 0; > #endif > int force_laptop = 0; > + int not_a_laptop = 0; > char *arg; > > arg = extract_programmer_param("boardenable"); > @@ -170,9 +171,11 @@ int internal_init(void) > free(arg); > > arg = extract_programmer_param("laptop"); > - if (arg && !strcmp(arg,"force_I_want_a_brick")) { > + if (arg && !strcmp(arg,"force_I_want_a_brick")) > force_laptop = 1; > - } else if (arg && !strlen(arg)) { > + else if (arg && !strcmp(arg,"this_is_not_a_laptop")) > + not_a_laptop = 1; > + else if (arg && !strlen(arg)) { > msg_perr("Missing argument for laptop.\n"); > free(arg); > return 1; > @@ -237,7 +240,7 @@ int internal_init(void) > msg_perr("WARNING! You may be running flashrom on an unsupported laptop. We could\n" > "not detect this for sure because your vendor has not setup the SMBIOS\n" > "tables correctly. You can enforce execution by adding\n" > - "'-p internal:laptop=force_I_want_a_brick' to the command line, but\n" > + "'-p internal:laptop=this_is_not_a_laptop' to the command line, but\n" > "please read the following warning if you are not sure.\n\n"); > } > msg_perr("Laptops, notebooks and netbooks are difficult to support and we\n" > @@ -251,9 +254,8 @@ int internal_init(void) > "You have been warned.\n" > "========================================================================\n"); > > - if (force_laptop) { > - msg_perr("Proceeding anyway because user specified " > - "laptop=force_I_want_a_brick\n"); > + if (force_laptop || (not_a_laptop && (is_laptop != 1))) { > + msg_perr("Proceeding anyway because user forced us to.\n"); > } else { > msg_perr("Aborting.\n"); > exit(1); > -- > 1.7.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom >

1 0

Re: [flashrom] [PATCH] dmi: add "Sealed-case PC" to the list of non-laptop chassis
by Idwer Vollering 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

2011/8/22 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at>: > --- > not sure though if all other computers with that chassis type are "in all > likelihood not a laptop". This writeup looks rather convincing: http://www.novell.com/communities/node/3519/adding-more-addon-image-files-b… > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)student.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer(a)gmail.com> > --- > dmi.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dmi.c b/dmi.c > index 8f78376..5f64b94 100644 > --- a/dmi.c > +++ b/dmi.c > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct { > {0x0e, 1, "Sub Notebook"}, > {0x11, 0, "Main Server Chassis"}, > {0x17, 0, "Rack Mount Chassis"}, > + {0x18, 0, "Sealed-case PC"}, /* used by Supermicro (X8SIE) */ > }; > > #define DMI_COMMAND_LEN_MAX 260 > -- > 1.7.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > flashrom mailing list > flashrom(a)flashrom.org > http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom >

1 0

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

flashrom August 2011