[Patch] Mark w25q80, w25q32, and w25q64 chips tested for write and erase

[David Hendricks]

I'm actually not entirely sure why the W25Q80 and W25Q32 were marked as "OK"
for erase but not write. In any case, I've successfully read/erased/written
all three of these Winbond chips using nm10 and amd870 based mainboards.

I see no reason why the W25Q16 would not work as well, but I don't have one
to try so I left it out of this patch.

Signed-off-by: David Hendricks

[Patch] Mark w25q80, w25q32, and w25q64 chips tested for write and erase

[Stefan Reinauer]

* David Hendricks  [101015 05:27]:
> I'm actually not entirely sure why the W25Q80 and W25Q32 were marked as "OK"
> for erase but not write. In any case, I've successfully read/erased/written all
> three of these Winbond chips using nm10 and amd870 based mainboards.
>
> I see no reason why the W25Q16 would not work as well, but I don't have one to
> try so I left it out of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks

Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer
>
> Index: flashrom-foo/flashchips.c
>
> --- flashrom-foo.orig/flashchips.c	2010-10-14 20:18:44.000000000 -0700
> +++ flashrom-foo/flashchips.c	2010-10-14 20:19:04.000000000 -0700
> @@ -7009,7 +7009,7 @@
>    	.total_size	= 1024,
>    	.page_size	= 256,
>    	.feature_bits	= FEATURE_WRSR_WREN,
> .tested		= TEST_OK_PRE,
> .tested		= TEST_OK_PREW,
> .probe		= probe_spi_rdid,
> .probe_timing	= TIMING_ZERO,
> .block_erasers	=
>
> @@ -7081,7 +7081,7 @@
>    	.total_size	= 4096,
>    	.page_size	= 256,
>    	.feature_bits	= FEATURE_WRSR_WREN,
> .tested		= TEST_OK_PRE,
> .tested		= TEST_OK_PREW,
> .probe		= probe_spi_rdid,
> .probe_timing	= TIMING_ZERO,
> .block_erasers	=
>
> @@ -7117,7 +7117,7 @@
>    	.total_size	= 8192,
>    	.page_size	= 256,
>    	.feature_bits	= FEATURE_WRSR_WREN,
> .tested		= TEST_OK_PR,
> .tested		= TEST_OK_PREW,
> .probe		= probe_spi_rdid,
> .probe_timing	= TIMING_ZERO,
> .block_erasers	=

Mark w25q80, w25q32, and w25q64 chips tested for write and erase

[Stefan Tauner]

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:27:23 -0000
David Hendricks  wrote:
> I'm actually not entirely sure why the W25Q80 and W25Q32 were marked as "OK"
> for erase but not write. In any case, I've successfully read/erased/written
> all three of these Winbond chips using nm10 and amd870 based mainboards.
>
> I see no reason why the W25Q16 would not work as well, but I don't have one
> to try so I left it out of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks 
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer

applied in r1303, thanks