Re: [flashrom] Flashrom wiki: what license is the content under?

[Sam Kuper]

On 20/03/2017, Sam Kuper <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On 20/03/2017, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > On 18.03.2017 17:50, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > > Ideally, Flashrom would license the content under the GFDL and CC
> > > BY-SA 3.0, making the content entirely license-compatible with content
> > > from Wikipedia and from the Stack Exchange network of websites.
> >
> > Any licensing which inhibits moving code comments to the wiki or vice
> > versa is a really bad idea.
>
> I doubt this would be a problem in practice. I think there are
> standard exceptions for this sort of thing. But I'll try to remember
> to look into it, because if there *aren't* exceptions for it, then
> you're right: it could be a problem.

Also, even if the wiki content were licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0, I
don't see how there would be any more of an impediment to moving text
between the code and the wiki than presently exists. Please correct me
if you think I am mistaken.