[PATCH] Convert SPI block erase to multicommand
Convert SPI block erase to use the multicommand infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c (Revision 648) +++ flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -536,17 +536,30 @@ int spi_block_erase_52(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_BE_52_OUTSIZE] = {JEDEC_BE_52, }; int result; + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_BE_52_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_BE_52, (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16, (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8, (addr & 0x000000ff) }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = 0, + .writearr = NULL, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }}; - cmd[1] = (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16; - cmd[2] = (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8; - cmd[3] = (addr & 0x000000ff); - result = spi_write_enable(); - if (result) + result = spi_send_multicommand(spicommands); + if (result) { + printf_debug("%s failed during command execution\n", __func__); return result; - /* Send BE (Block Erase) */ - spi_send_command(sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + } /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared. * This usually takes 100-4000 ms, so wait in 100 ms steps. */ @@ -566,17 +579,30 @@ */ int spi_block_erase_d8(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_BE_D8_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_BE_D8, }; int result; + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_BE_D8_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_BE_D8, (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16, (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8, (addr & 0x000000ff) }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = 0, + .writearr = NULL, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }}; - cmd[1] = (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16; - cmd[2] = (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8; - cmd[3] = (addr & 0x000000ff); - result = spi_write_enable(); - if (result) + result = spi_send_multicommand(spicommands); + if (result) { + printf_debug("%s failed during command execution\n", __func__); return result; - /* Send BE (Block Erase) */ - spi_send_command(sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + } /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared. * This usually takes 100-4000 ms, so wait in 100 ms steps. */ @@ -615,18 +641,30 @@ /* Sector size is usually 4k, though Macronix eliteflash has 64k */ int spi_block_erase_20(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_SE_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_SE, }; int result; - - cmd[1] = (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16; - cmd[2] = (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8; - cmd[3] = (addr & 0x000000ff); + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_SE_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_SE, (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16, (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8, (addr & 0x000000ff) }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = 0, + .writearr = NULL, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }}; - result = spi_write_enable(); - if (result) + result = spi_send_multicommand(spicommands); + if (result) { + printf_debug("%s failed during command execution\n", __func__); return result; - /* Send SE (Sector Erase) */ - spi_send_command(sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + } /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared. * This usually takes 15-800 ms, so wait in 10 ms steps. */ -- http://www.hailfinger.org/
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger<c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
Convert SPI block erase to use the multicommand infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested it on my EPIA-m700 and it worked nice. Also double checked that one of the changed functions actually ran. I do have one comment on the patch which is a really small comment but I still would like to see fied, see below:
Index: flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c (Revision 648) +++ flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -536,17 +536,30 @@
int spi_block_erase_52(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_BE_52_OUTSIZE] = {JEDEC_BE_52, }; int result; + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_BE_52_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_BE_52, (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16, (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8, (addr & 0x000000ff) },
From what I can see in the rest of the file the address shifts seems to be on this done like this "(addr >> 16) && 0xff" instead of "(addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16".
But you still get my Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com> Cheers Jakob.
On 12.07.2009 00:12, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger<c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
Convert SPI block erase to use the multicommand infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested it on my EPIA-m700 and it worked nice. Also double checked that one of the changed functions actually ran.
From what I can see in the rest of the file the address shifts seems to be on this done like this "(addr >> 16) && 0xff" instead of "(addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16".
Done. New patch inlined for reference.
But you still get my Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Thanks! Convert SPI block erase to use the multicommand infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Index: flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c =================================================================== --- flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c (Revision 648) +++ flashrom-spi_multicommand_blockerase/spi.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -536,17 +536,30 @@ int spi_block_erase_52(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_BE_52_OUTSIZE] = {JEDEC_BE_52, }; int result; + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_BE_52_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_BE_52, (addr >> 16) & 0xff, (addr >> 8) & 0xff, (addr & 0xff) }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = 0, + .writearr = NULL, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }}; - cmd[1] = (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16; - cmd[2] = (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8; - cmd[3] = (addr & 0x000000ff); - result = spi_write_enable(); - if (result) + result = spi_send_multicommand(spicommands); + if (result) { + printf_debug("%s failed during command execution\n", __func__); return result; - /* Send BE (Block Erase) */ - spi_send_command(sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + } /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared. * This usually takes 100-4000 ms, so wait in 100 ms steps. */ @@ -566,17 +579,30 @@ */ int spi_block_erase_d8(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_BE_D8_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_BE_D8, }; int result; + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_BE_D8_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_BE_D8, (addr >> 16) & 0xff, (addr >> 8) & 0xff, (addr & 0xff) }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = 0, + .writearr = NULL, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }}; - cmd[1] = (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16; - cmd[2] = (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8; - cmd[3] = (addr & 0x000000ff); - result = spi_write_enable(); - if (result) + result = spi_send_multicommand(spicommands); + if (result) { + printf_debug("%s failed during command execution\n", __func__); return result; - /* Send BE (Block Erase) */ - spi_send_command(sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + } /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared. * This usually takes 100-4000 ms, so wait in 100 ms steps. */ @@ -615,18 +641,30 @@ /* Sector size is usually 4k, though Macronix eliteflash has 64k */ int spi_block_erase_20(struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen) { - unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_SE_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_SE, }; int result; - - cmd[1] = (addr & 0x00ff0000) >> 16; - cmd[2] = (addr & 0x0000ff00) >> 8; - cmd[3] = (addr & 0x000000ff); + struct spi_command spicommands[] = { + { + .writecnt = JEDEC_WREN_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_WREN }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = JEDEC_SE_OUTSIZE, + .writearr = (const unsigned char[]){ JEDEC_SE, (addr >> 16) & 0xff, (addr >> 8) & 0xff, (addr & 0xff) }, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }, { + .writecnt = 0, + .writearr = NULL, + .readcnt = 0, + .readarr = NULL, + }}; - result = spi_write_enable(); - if (result) + result = spi_send_multicommand(spicommands); + if (result) { + printf_debug("%s failed during command execution\n", __func__); return result; - /* Send SE (Sector Erase) */ - spi_send_command(sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + } /* Wait until the Write-In-Progress bit is cleared. * This usually takes 15-800 ms, so wait in 10 ms steps. */ -- http://www.hailfinger.org/
On 12.07.2009 00:23, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Convert SPI block erase to use the multicommand infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
To make patchwork happy, I'll just repaste Jakob's ack. Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com> Committed in r650. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/
participants (2)
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Jakob Bornecrantz