[PATCH] Fix erase for SST49LF020A

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Fix erase for SST49LF020A. The chip supports multiple erase functions,
but the function we use has an eraseblock size of 4k.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>

Index: flashrom-sst49lf020a/flashchips.c
===================================================================
--- flashrom-sst49lf020a/flashchips.c	(Revision 659)
+++ flashrom-sst49lf020a/flashchips.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -2160,7 +2160,7 @@
 		.manufacture_id	= SST_ID,
 		.model_id	= SST_49LF020A,
 		.total_size	= 256,
-		.page_size	= 16 * 1024,
+		.page_size	= 4 * 1024,
 		.tested		= TEST_UNTESTED,
 		.probe		= probe_jedec,
 		.probe_timing	= 1,			/* 150 ns */ 


-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/

[Stefan Reinauer]

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Fix erase for SST49LF020A. The chip supports multiple erase functions,
> but the function we use has an eraseblock size of 4k.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>

Ooops.

Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[e-mail]>
> Index: flashrom-sst49lf020a/flashchips.c
> ===================================================================
> --- flashrom-sst49lf020a/flashchips.c	(Revision 659)
> +++ flashrom-sst49lf020a/flashchips.c	(Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -2160,7 +2160,7 @@
>       .manufacture_id	= SST_ID,
>       .model_id	= SST_49LF020A,
>       .total_size	= 256,
> -		.page_size	= 16 * 1024,
> +		.page_size	= 4 * 1024,
>       .tested		= TEST_UNTESTED,
>       .probe		= probe_jedec,
>       .probe_timing	= 1,			/* 150 ns */

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 23.07.2009 03:43, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Fix erase for SST49LF020A. The chip supports multiple erase functions,
> > but the function we use has an eraseblock size of 4k.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>
>
> Ooops.
>
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[e-mail]>

Thanks, r664.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/