We have loads of pending patches and I'd like to reduce them to a manageable number. I plan to review everything not written by me unless it needs testing on real hardware.
A list of pending patches is available here: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/project/flashrom/list/ The patch name listed in patchwork is basically the subject of the mail containing the patch.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
We have loads of pending patches and I'd like to reduce them to a manageable number. I plan to review everything not written by me unless it needs testing on real hardware.
A list of pending patches is available here: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/project/flashrom/list/ The patch name listed in patchwork is basically the subject of the mail containing the patch.
* Fix strict aliasing in serprog * more flashchips.c .probe_timing updates ... * Reduce probe code duplication, fix 82802AB * Blockwise erase infrastructure * add intel_piix4_gpo_set() * Shuttle AK31
are Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de
The others seem to need work, are not for merging or otherwise unclear.
Stefan
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
We have loads of pending patches and I'd like to reduce them to a manageable number. I plan to review everything not written by me unless it needs testing on real hardware.
A list of pending patches is available here: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/project/flashrom/list/ The patch name listed in patchwork is basically the subject of the mail containing the patch.
- add intel_piix4_gpo_set()
- Shuttle AK31
These two need testing, but the AK31 seems pretty safe and will be committed tomorrow together with an addition to the board_notes table about this board still needing testing.
The intel_piix4 thing does need a test though, it is rather substantial and non-trivial.
But thanks for the Acks :)
Luc Verhaegen.
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Luc Verhaegen -
Stefan Reinauer