On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:54:50 -0700 David Hendricks email@example.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Stefan Tauner firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:16:18 -0700 David Hendricks email@example.com wrote:
I'd love to hear some arguments about your preferences.
I'd be fine with libflashrom_. Since it seems there is no definitive favorite short prefix I think we should just forget about those and use a longer one. And in the grand scheme of things neither libflashrom_ nor flashrom_ are very long.
After hearing the arguments on the list I too formed an opinion about the matter, my preference list is:
- flashrom_ (the lib prefix is redundant IMHO, lot of libraries omit it in the API, e.g.: libglib, libgtk); - libflashrom_ (I would tolerate it, it's still better than cryptic prefixes);
and maybe one I didn't see:
- libfr_ (flash-rom is two words, so "fr" as abbreviation makes sense, but there's really no need to be so concise).
Ciao ciao, Antonio