[PATCH] flashrom 0.9.2

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Finally! (And yes, I know that the release announement still needs to be
written, and we have some pending bugfixes. I just want to get this out
now to resume normal development, and AFAICS it has no regressions.)

Increase flashrom release number to 0.9.2.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

Index: flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile
===================================================================
--- flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile	(Revision 998)
+++ flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 # will not require subversion. The downloadable snapshots are already exported.
 SVNVERSION := $(shell LC_ALL=C svnversion -cn . 2>/dev/null | sed -e "s/.*://" -e "s/([0-9]*).*/\1/" | grep "[0-9]" || LC_ALL=C svn info . 2>/dev/null | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $$2 }' | grep "[0-9]" || LC_ALL=C git svn info . 2>/dev/null | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $$2 }' | grep "[0-9]" || echo unknown)

-RELEASE := 0.9.1
+RELEASE := 0.9.2
 VERSION := $(RELEASE)-r$(SVNVERSION)
 RELEASENAME ?= $(VERSION)

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Hi,

here are the commit stats (I counted the Signed-off-by statements
instead of committers) since 0.9.1 for the top 5 committers:
21 Uwe Hermann 
23 Luc Verhaegen 
48 Michael Karcher 
53 Sean Nelson 
97 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

It would be nice to get an ack from all of you for the 0.9.2 release.

The 0.9.2 release will be commit number 1000.

On 18.05.2010 01:59, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Finally! (And yes, I know that the release announement still needs to be
> written, and we have some pending bugfixes. I just want to get this out
> now to resume normal development, and AFAICS it has no regressions.)
>
> Increase flashrom release number to 0.9.2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
> Index: flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile
>
> --- flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile	(Revision 998)
> +++ flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile	(Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
>  # will not require subversion. The downloadable snapshots are already exported.
>  SVNVERSION := $(shell LC_ALL=C svnversion -cn . 2>/dev/null | sed -e "s/.*://" -e "s/([0-9]*).*/\1/" | grep "[0-9]" || LC_ALL=C svn info . 2>/dev/null | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $$2 }' | grep "[0-9]" || LC_ALL=C git svn info . 2>/dev/null | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $$2 }' | grep "[0-9]" || echo unknown)
>
> -RELEASE := 0.9.1
> +RELEASE := 0.9.2
>  VERSION := $(RELEASE)-r$(SVNVERSION)
>  RELEASENAME ?= $(VERSION)

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

[Sean Nelson]

On 5/18/10 3:45 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here are the commit stats (I counted the Signed-off-by statements
> instead of committers) since 0.9.1 for the top 5 committers:
> 21 Uwe Hermann
> 23 Luc Verhaegen
> 48 Michael Karcher
> 53 Sean Nelson
> 97 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
>
> It would be nice to get an ack from all of you for the 0.9.2 release.
>
> The 0.9.2 release will be commit number 1000.
>
> On 18.05.2010 01:59, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Finally! (And yes, I know that the release announement still needs to be
> > written, and we have some pending bugfixes. I just want to get this out
> > now to resume normal development, and AFAICS it has no regressions.)
> >
> > Increase flashrom release number to 0.9.2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
> > Index: flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile
> >
> > --- flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile	(Revision 998)
> > +++ flashrom-0.9.2/Makefile	(Arbeitskopie)
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> >   # will not require subversion. The downloadable snapshots are already exported.
> >   SVNVERSION := $(shell LC_ALL=C svnversion -cn . 2>/dev/null | sed -e "s/.*://" -e "s/([0-9]*).*/\1/" | grep "[0-9]" || LC_ALL=C svn info . 2>/dev/null | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $$2 }' | grep "[0-9]" || LC_ALL=C git svn info . 2>/dev/null | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $$2 }' | grep "[0-9]" || echo unknown)
> >
> > -RELEASE := 0.9.1
> > +RELEASE := 0.9.2
> >   VERSION := $(RELEASE)-r$(SVNVERSION)
> >   RELEASENAME ?= $(VERSION)
>
> Regards,
> Carl-Daniel

Acked-by: Sean Nelson

[Uwe Hermann]

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:01:19PM -0700, Sean Nelson wrote:
> > It would be nice to get an ack from all of you for the 0.9.2 release.

Acked-by: Uwe Hermann

Uwe.

[Michael Karcher]

Am Mittwoch, den 19.05.2010, 00:45 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
> Hi,
>
> here are the commit stats (I counted the Signed-off-by statements
> instead of committers) since 0.9.1 for the top 5 committers:
> 21 Uwe Hermann 
> 23 Luc Verhaegen 
> 48 Michael Karcher 
> 53 Sean Nelson 
> 97 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
>
> It would be nice to get an ack from all of you for the 0.9.2 release.

As it seems that the "we have too much untested-for-erase" problem
together with the "please send erase reports we are going to ignore"
problem is not intended to be solved for 0.9.2, and though I don't like
this state of the code, I'm not going to deny the release for that:

Acked-by: Michael Karcher

Regards,
  Michael Karcher

[Luc Verhaegen]

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:59:19AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Finally! (And yes, I know that the release announement still needs to be
> written, and we have some pending bugfixes. I just want to get this out
> now to resume normal development, and AFAICS it has no regressions.)
>
> Increase flashrom release number to 0.9.2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

Sorry, i haven't been following flashrom much for the past few months, 
so i am not in a position to judge anything real.

But for the sake of getting a release out:

Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen

Great work all on getting to commit 1000, that's a lot of work for a 
program that is about 15kloc, which consists mostly of people filling in 
unknowns and blanks.

Luc Verhaegen.

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 18.05.2010 01:59, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Finally! (And yes, I know that the release announement still needs to be
> written, and we have some pending bugfixes. I just want to get this out
> now to resume normal development, and AFAICS it has no regressions.)
>
> Increase flashrom release number to 0.9.2.

Thanks everyone for the acks, for the code you contributed and for the
time you spent reviewing code!

The tree is now open again for all sorts of commits.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel