On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:48:33 +0200 Paul Menzel paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 21.07.2011, 14:23 +0200 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
old output: Calibrating delay loop... OK. Found chipset "Intel QS57", enabling flash write... OK. This chipset supports the following protocols: FWH, SPI.
new non-verbose output for tested chipsets: Calibrating delay loop... OK. Found chipset "Intel QS57". Enabling flash write... OK. This chipset supports the following protocols: FWH, SPI.
new non-verbose output for untested chipsets: Found chipset "Intel QS57". This chipset is marked as untested. If you are using an up-to-date version of flashrom please email a report to flashrom@flashrom.org including a verbose (-V) log. Thank you!
A similar message should be shown somewhere else.
hm?
I would put more information in it.
This chipset is marked as untested. If you are using an up-to-date version of flashrom http://flashrom.org/Downloads please email a report to flashrom@flashrom.org with the subject (variable with the name (here Intel QS57) including a verbose (-V) log. Thank you!
i prefer shorter messages, because i hope they get read then. the untested flash chip message is much longer with information in it like you suggested... and the ratio of users that obey all our wishes are way below 50%... i am happy if they manage to send us a verbose log in any way :)
Do we have preferences if the log should be pasted or attached?
for single logs inline is better, but i dont really care... as long as they are not compressed.
thanks for your input.