On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:10:22 +0100 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
The AT25F512B is quite different from the other (older and yet unsupported) chips in the AT25F* familiy, hence rename 512B-specific stuff to make room for the generic AT25F* code
i'd like to get in the remaining patches of this set rather sooner than later. imho they are pretty ready (i have at least added the voltage fields while rebasing and incorporated your earlier comments iirc), but maybe there are some small bits missing/wrong. but what i really would like to know is if you agree on the naming and code placement (especially spi_block_erase_62). if there is a general agreement on that i can self-review the details. i cant remember what i have done back then anyway :P