On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:54:53 +0200 Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Nuff said. Well, the S33 naming might be no ideal, RFC.
Stefan Tauner (4): Improve SPI status register pretty printing. Add a generic SPI block unprotect function. Add support for Intel S33 series flash chips. Add support for Atmel's AT25F series of SPI flash chips.
Makefile | 4 +- a25.c | 100 --------- at25.c | 281 ------------------------- chipdrivers.h | 50 +++-- flash.h | 1 + flashchips.c | 522 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- flashchips.h | 17 +- spi.h | 8 +- spi25.c | 298 ++------------------------ spi25_statusreg.c | 601 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 10 files changed, 1169 insertions(+), 713 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 a25.c delete mode 100644 at25.c create mode 100644 spi25_statusreg.c
Self-acked and committed in r1634-r1637 with small improvements in 1/4.