Re: [flashrom] Confirming successful write for AT29C010A

[Daniele Forsi]

2014-07-10 13:53 GMT+02:00 Stefan Tauner:
> The unspecified DMI chassis type is a missing bit/bug in coreboot of
> that board (and possibly the original firmware). There is a whitelist
> in flashrom to work around that but i dont think it is worth it.

indeed it was missing in the original firmware and I agree that it's
not worth for a board of year 2000 (it's a thin client which is nice
for experiments because of its small footprint and fanless CPU)