On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:34:13 +0100 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Am 22.02.2012 00:14 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
sfdp_add_uniform_eraser checks for existing erasers. Due to a bug it looked for eraser slots that have no erase functions set instead of those that have one set.
Postpone adding an erase function for the special 4k block erase opcode until we know the flash chip size and add an additional check to sfdp_add_uniform_eraser.
Fix the output of the parameter table contents.
This patch fixes the index used to retrieve the eraser types, which was off one double word.
Refine some messages and add a few further debugging prints.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at
I assume this has been tested with the dummy simulator.
now it has been ;) the only additional change i have made: i have indented the "It seems like this chip supports the preliminary Intel version"…
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
thanks, committed in r1505. let's hope we have tackled everything. :)