Re: [flashrom] Report

Здравствуйте, Stefan.

Вы писали 6 января 2015 г., 4:32:44:

Hi, Stefan!!

Sorry, i tested write twice and i tested also full erased chip cFeon EN25P64

all ok with it with "EN25B64" variant.

about size ot sector i may say nothing.

If  you  want - send me flashrom debug variant and i run it and i send
report to you.

What you say?

P.S.

If you want - i may use rayer_spi or arm-usb-tiny-h devices.

----------

Sorry, Stefan, i can inadequate question to you?

I need read unique ID info and OTP zones from W25Q64BV, W25Q64CV and W25Q64FV
chips. also, MX25L6405

Please, maybe is it patch or OTP_version of flashrom to read it datas?
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 07:36:42 +0500
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > Здравствуйте, Flashrom.
> >
> > I try read chip cFeon EN25P64 - 16 pins, through adapter SPI 16 to 8
> > but flashrom show two INVALID variants:
> >
> > #flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=arm-usb-tiny-h
> >
> > flashrom v0.9.7-r1852 on Linux 3.2.66 (i686)
> > flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org
> >
> > Calibrating delay loop... OK.
> > Found Eon flash chip "EN25B64" (8192 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi.
> > Found Eon flash chip "EN25B64T" (8192 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi.
> > Multiple flash chip definitions match the detected chip(s): "EN25B64", "EN25B64T"
> > Please specify which chip definition to use with the -c <chipname> option.
> >
> > read normally:
> >
> > date
> > flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=arm-usb-tiny-h -c EN25B64 -r 234
> > date
> >
> > 1 min 5 sec
> >
> > write okey:
> >
> > flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=arm-usb-tiny-h -c EN25B64 -w 3883
> > flashrom v0.9.7-r1852 on Linux 3.2.66 (i686)
> > flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org
> >
> > Calibrating delay loop... OK.
> > Found Eon flash chip "EN25B64" (8192 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi.
> > ===
> > This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: PROBE READ ERASE WRITE
> > The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development
> > version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version,
> > please email a report to [e-mail] if any of the above operations
> > work correctly for you with this flash chip. Please include the flashrom log
> > file for all operations you tested (see the man page for details), and mention
> > which mainboard or programmer you tested in the subject line.
> > Thanks for your help!
> > Reading old flash chip contents... done.
> > Erasing and writing flash chip... Erase/write done.
> > Verifying flash... VERIFIED.
> Здравствуйте! :)
> Thank you for your report.
> The reason why you see the "EN25B64" and "EN25B64T" variants be detect
> is that they have the same RDID as the EN25P64, which is not uncommon.
> However if I interpret your email correctly, then you have written your
> EN25P64 successfully and without warnings or error messages by using
> the flash chip definition of EN25B64. This is confusing for me because
> it should actually not work. The EN25P64 and EN25B64 have very
> different block layouts. The P variant has a unified sector size of
> 64kB while the B variants have "Two 4-Kbyte, one 8-Kbyte, one 16-Kbyte,
> one 32-Kbyte, and one hundred twenty-seven 64-Kbyte sectors".
> Did I miss something?