On 26. mai 2010 16:18, Michael Karcher wrote:
Maybe because we preferrably choose chips with subsystem IDs. Maybe because someone thought that a new board revision very probably contains a more modern graphics chip. In this case, you are very right in suggesting to take the network chip as secondary PCI ID. You need to find out what subsystem IDs are used (if any) in the DL145 and the DL165.
If you send
- lspci -vvvxxxnn, superiotool -deV and flashrom -V output of your
DL165 (general requirement for having new boards added),
- an updated patch that uses the network instead of the graphics chip
for both boards, including a sign-off[1],
- preferably at least PCI ID info including subsystems for the DL145,
According to http://merlin.ugent.be/~samuel/dl145g3/info/lspci-vnn.txt, the DL145 is equipped thus:
08:04.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5715 Gigabit Ethernet [14e4:1678] (rev a3) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NC326i PCIe Dual Port Gigabit Server Adapter [103c:703e]
Full lspci listing and superio and flashrom output for the DL165 follows, as well as updated patch.
Signed-off-by: Arne Georg Gleditsch arne.gleditsch@numascale.com