On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:00:52 +0100 Marcin Kościelnicki koriakin@0x04.net wrote:
Signed-Off-By: Marcin Kościelnicki koriakin@0x04.net
Index: chipset_enable.c
--- chipset_enable.c (revision 1764) +++ chipset_enable.c (working copy) @@ -1075,6 +1075,15 @@ return 0; }
+static int enable_flash_nvidia_nforce(struct pci_dev *dev, const char *name) +{
rpci_write_byte(dev, 0x7a, 0);
if (enable_flash_nvidia_common(dev, name))
return ERROR_NONFATAL;
else
return 0;
+}
- static int enable_flash_nvidia_nforce2(struct pci_dev *dev, const char
*name) { rpci_write_byte(dev, 0x92, 0); @@ -1417,6 +1426,7 @@ {0x10de, 0x00e0, OK, "NVIDIA", "NForce3", enable_flash_nvidia_nforce2}, /* Slave, should not be here, to fix known bug for A01. */ {0x10de, 0x00d3, OK, "NVIDIA", "CK804", enable_flash_ck804},
{0x10de, 0x01b2, OK, "NVIDIA", "NForce",
enable_flash_nvidia_nforce}, {0x10de, 0x0260, OK, "NVIDIA", "MCP51", enable_flash_ck804}, {0x10de, 0x0261, NT, "NVIDIA", "MCP51", enable_flash_ck804}, {0x10de, 0x0262, NT, "NVIDIA", "MCP51", enable_flash_ck804},
Hello Marcin,
thanks for your patch! Can you please give us a bit of background information? AFAIK the datasheets of this chipset were never public. Did you RE it for a specific board? (then why is there no report on that? :) I also wonder if we should check that the write in enable_flash_nvidia_nforce sticks and return with an error otherwise?