Re: [flashrom] [PATCH/RFC] finish jedec converstion

[Sean Nelson]

On 1/25/2010 9:40 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Ummm... technically, the probe function changed (well, in practice the
> command sequence should be identical). Do we want to keep TEST_OK_PR if
> the probe function changed?
>
> Regards,
> Carl-Daniel

On 1/24/2010 1:54 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> I guess that was done wrong before, but all chips touched like that 
> need to be changed back to untested unless you retested each of them. 
> Otherwise the test flags become quite meaningless...
>
> Stefan

I'm thinking that Stefan is right: we should change all the chips to 
TEST_UNTESTED since the last few patches I've written have had radical 
changes.
This latest version of the patch reflects that.