Hi Stephan. Thanks for looking at the patch.
On 2011.06.05 01:45, Stefan Tauner wrote:
i think armusbtiny or arm-usb-tiny would be better. is the name without dashes used anywhere in the docs, software etc. supplied by olimex?
I always seem to see the name used with dashes and all caps when referenced by Olimex in its documentation, but I too agree that it's fairly ugly, and I wouldn't mind doing away with both. Right now I'm planning to go with 'armusbtiny', unless you prefer to keep the dashes there. The Olimex website does use lowercase + dashes for the product (eg: http://www.olimex.com/dev/arm-usb-tiny-h.html or http://www.olimex.com/dev/arm-usb-ocd.html)
if so please resend the patch with "armusbtiny", else its probably better to use the original name the vendor chose(?) as you know there is also a -h version available from olimex. you dont happen to know the ids i guess? :)
Say no more... ;) I think the -H version, as well as ARM-USB-OCD(-H), which are pretty much the same thing as ARM-USB-TINY(-H), only with an RS232 port added, should be safe to include even if these are untested right now. Unless you object, I'll add these devices to v2 of the patch. Names would be 'armusbtinyh', 'armusbocd' and 'armusbocdh'.
also if it's not too much of a hassle, please also post a verbose log showing the device in action.
I'll do that.
Regards,
/Pete