On 2/5/10 4:29 PM, TJ wrote:
Uncertain values now confirmed.
If you're happy with the new EN29LV800 code I'll submit a combined patch with a Signed-off-by tag.
flashchips.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c index b5be180..10b8dea 100644 --- a/flashchips.c +++ b/flashchips.c @@ -2166,15 +2166,15 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { { .vendor = "EON", .name = "EN29LV800(B)(C)B",
.bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_UNKNOWN,
.manufacture_id = EON_ID, .model_id = EN_29LV800B, .total_size = 1024,.bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_PARALLEL,
.page_size = 1024, // TODO: check this
.feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_AAA | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec,.page_size = 1024,
.probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, /* TODO: check Datasheet has no timing info specified */
.erase = NULL, .block_erasers = {.probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO,
@@ -2198,15 +2198,15 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = { { .vendor = "EON", .name = "EN29LV800(B)(C)T",
.bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_UNKNOWN,
.manufacture_id = EON_ID, .model_id = EN_29LV800T, .total_size = 1024,.bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_PARALLEL,
.page_size = 1024, // TODO: check this
.feature_bits = FEATURE_ADDR_AAA | FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, .tested = TEST_UNTESTED, .probe = probe_jedec,.page_size = 1024,
.probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, /* TODO: check Datasheet has no timing info specified */
.erase = NULL, .block_erasers = {.probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO,
EN29LV800 is not a JEDEC compatible chip, it uses an odd command sequence like the M29F400BT